These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19243487)

  • 1. Optimal climbing speed explains the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders.
    Moya-Laraño J; Vinković D; Allard CM; Foellmer MW
    J Evol Biol; 2009 May; 22(5):954-63. PubMed ID: 19243487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism.
    Corcobado G; Rodríguez-Gironés MA; De Mas E; Moya-Laraño J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 10():236. PubMed ID: 20682029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.
    Cheng RC; Kuntner M
    Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):2861-72. PubMed ID: 25130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competing dwarf males: sexual selection in an orb-weaving spider.
    Foellmer MW; Fairbairn DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):629-41. PubMed ID: 15842492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Small size does not confer male agility advantages in a sexually-size dimorphic spider.
    Quiñones-Lebrón SG; Gregorič M; Kuntner M; Kralj-Fišer S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216036. PubMed ID: 31091246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resurrecting the differential mortality model of sexual size dimorphism.
    De Mas E; Ribera C; Moya-Laraño J
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1739-49. PubMed ID: 19627415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of sexual cannibalism within and among species of spiders.
    Wilder SM; Rypstra AL
    Am Nat; 2008 Sep; 172(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 18616388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders.
    Kuntner M; Agnarsson I; Li D
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Feb; 90(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 24809822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence.
    Stephens PR; Wiens JJ
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):910-25. PubMed ID: 19210531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.
    Herczeg G; Gonda A; Merilä J
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 20202005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energetics, scaling and sexual size dimorphism of spiders.
    Grossi B; Canals M
    Acta Biotheor; 2015 Mar; 63(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 25084999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex-specific plasticity of growth and maturation size in a spider: implications for sexual size dimorphism.
    Fernández-Montraveta C; Moya-Laraño J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1689-99. PubMed ID: 17714286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Have male and female genitalia coevolved? A phylogenetic analysis of genitalic morphology and sexual size dimorphism in web-building spiders (Araneae: Araneoidea).
    Ramos M; Coddington JA; Christenson TE; Irschick DJ
    Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1989-99. PubMed ID: 16261736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.
    Lislevand T; Figuerola J; Székely T
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1895-905. PubMed ID: 19682306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of asymmetric genitalia in spiders and insects.
    Huber BA; Sinclair BJ; Schmitt M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):647-98. PubMed ID: 17944621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A change in competitive context reverses sexual selection on male size.
    Kasumovic MM; Andrade MC
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19032500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Silk elasticity as a potential constraint on spider body size.
    Rodríguez-Gironés MA; Corcobado G; Moya-Laraño J
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 20600136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
    Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
    Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards.
    Butler MA; Schoener TW; Losos JB
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):259-72. PubMed ID: 10937202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coevolution of female and male genital components to avoid genital size mismatches in sexually dimorphic spiders.
    Lupše N; Cheng RC; Kuntner M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27535025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.