207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19243487)
1. Optimal climbing speed explains the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders.
Moya-Laraño J; Vinković D; Allard CM; Foellmer MW
J Evol Biol; 2009 May; 22(5):954-63. PubMed ID: 19243487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism.
Corcobado G; Rodríguez-Gironés MA; De Mas E; Moya-Laraño J
BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 10():236. PubMed ID: 20682029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.
Cheng RC; Kuntner M
Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):2861-72. PubMed ID: 25130435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Competing dwarf males: sexual selection in an orb-weaving spider.
Foellmer MW; Fairbairn DJ
J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):629-41. PubMed ID: 15842492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small size does not confer male agility advantages in a sexually-size dimorphic spider.
Quiñones-Lebrón SG; Gregorič M; Kuntner M; Kralj-Fišer S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216036. PubMed ID: 31091246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resurrecting the differential mortality model of sexual size dimorphism.
De Mas E; Ribera C; Moya-Laraño J
J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1739-49. PubMed ID: 19627415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of sexual cannibalism within and among species of spiders.
Wilder SM; Rypstra AL
Am Nat; 2008 Sep; 172(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 18616388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders.
Kuntner M; Agnarsson I; Li D
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Feb; 90(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 24809822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of sexual size dimorphisms in emydid turtles: ecological dimorphism, rensch's rule, and sympatric divergence.
Stephens PR; Wiens JJ
Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):910-25. PubMed ID: 19210531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rensch's rule inverted--female-driven gigantism in nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius.
Herczeg G; Gonda A; Merilä J
J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):581-8. PubMed ID: 20202005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Energetics, scaling and sexual size dimorphism of spiders.
Grossi B; Canals M
Acta Biotheor; 2015 Mar; 63(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 25084999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex-specific plasticity of growth and maturation size in a spider: implications for sexual size dimorphism.
Fernández-Montraveta C; Moya-Laraño J
J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1689-99. PubMed ID: 17714286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Have male and female genitalia coevolved? A phylogenetic analysis of genitalic morphology and sexual size dimorphism in web-building spiders (Araneae: Araneoidea).
Ramos M; Coddington JA; Christenson TE; Irschick DJ
Evolution; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1989-99. PubMed ID: 16261736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in grouse and allies (Aves: Phasianidae) in relation to mating competition, fecundity demands and resource division.
Lislevand T; Figuerola J; Székely T
J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1895-905. PubMed ID: 19682306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The evolution of asymmetric genitalia in spiders and insects.
Huber BA; Sinclair BJ; Schmitt M
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):647-98. PubMed ID: 17944621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A change in competitive context reverses sexual selection on male size.
Kasumovic MM; Andrade MC
J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19032500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Silk elasticity as a potential constraint on spider body size.
Rodríguez-Gironés MA; Corcobado G; Moya-Laraño J
J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 20600136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards.
Butler MA; Schoener TW; Losos JB
Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):259-72. PubMed ID: 10937202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coevolution of female and male genital components to avoid genital size mismatches in sexually dimorphic spiders.
Lupše N; Cheng RC; Kuntner M
BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27535025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
