These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19243573)

  • 1. First evidence for slave rebellion: enslaved ant workers systematically kill the brood of their social parasite protomognathus americanus.
    Achenbach A; Foitzik S
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):1068-75. PubMed ID: 19243573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microsatellite analysis reveals strong but differential impact of a social parasite on its two host species.
    Fischer-Blass B; Heinze J; Foitzik S
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Mar; 15(3):863-72. PubMed ID: 16499708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A chemical level in the coevolutionary arms race between an ant social parasite and its hosts.
    Brandt M; Heinze J; Schmitt T; Foitzik S
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):576-86. PubMed ID: 15842487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coevolution in host-parasite systems: behavioural strategies of slave-making ants and their hosts.
    Foitzik S; DeHeer CJ; Hunjan DN; Herbers JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jun; 268(1472):1139-46. PubMed ID: 11375101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Locally adapted social parasite affects density, social structure, and life history of its ant hosts.
    Foitzik S; Achenbach A; Brandt M
    Ecology; 2009 May; 90(5):1195-206. PubMed ID: 19537541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of space and time on the evolution of altruistic defence: the case of ant slave rebellion.
    Metzler D; Jordan F; Pamminger T; Foitzik S
    J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):874-86. PubMed ID: 26873305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colony structure of a slavemaking ant. II. Frequency of slave raids and impact on the host population.
    Foitzik S; Herbers JM
    Evolution; 2001 Feb; 55(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 11308089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population structure and the co-evolution between social parasites and their hosts.
    Brandt M; Fischer-Blass B; Heinze J; Foitzik S
    Mol Ecol; 2007 May; 16(10):2063-78. PubMed ID: 17498232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The coevolutionary dynamics of obligate ant social parasite systems--between prudence and antagonism.
    Brandt M; Foitzik S; Fischer-Blass B; Heinze J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2005 May; 80(2):251-67. PubMed ID: 15921051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local co-adaptation leading to a geographical mosaic of coevolution in a social parasite system.
    Fischer B; Foitzik S
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Sep; 17(5):1026-34. PubMed ID: 15312075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blending in with the crowd: social parasites integrate into their host colonies using a flexible chemical signature.
    D'Ettorre P; Mondy N; Lenoir A; Errard C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Sep; 269(1503):1911-8. PubMed ID: 12350253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ant societies buffer individual-level effects of parasite infections.
    Scharf I; Modlmeier AP; Beros S; Foitzik S
    Am Nat; 2012 Nov; 180(5):671-83. PubMed ID: 23070326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facultative slave-making ants Formica sanguinea label their slaves with own recognition cues instead of employing the strategy of chemical mimicry.
    Włodarczyk T; Szczepaniak L
    J Insect Physiol; 2017 Jan; 96():98-107. PubMed ID: 27794425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ant parasite queens revert to mating singly.
    Sumner S; Hughes WO; Pedersen JS; Boomsma JJ
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):35-6. PubMed ID: 14999273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive conflict in social insects: male production by workers in a slave-making ant.
    Brunner E; Trindl A; Falk KH; Heinze J; D'Ettorre P
    Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2480-2. PubMed ID: 16396188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of parasite sympatry on the geographic mosaic of coevolution.
    Johnson CA; Herbers JM
    Ecology; 2006 Feb; 87(2):382-94. PubMed ID: 16637364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oh sister, where art thou? Spatial population structure and the evolution of an altruistic defence trait.
    Pamminger T; Foitzik S; Metzler D; Pennings PS
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2443-56. PubMed ID: 25262856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustical mimicry in a predatory social parasite of ants.
    Barbero F; Bonelli S; Thomas JA; Balletto E; Schönrogge K
    J Exp Biol; 2009 Dec; 212(Pt 24):4084-90. PubMed ID: 19946088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collective defence portfolios of ant hosts shift with social parasite pressure.
    Jongepier E; Kleeberg I; Job S; Foitzik S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Sep; 281(1791):20140225. PubMed ID: 25100690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dufour's gland secretion as a repellent used during usurpation by the slave-maker ant Rossomyrmex minuchae.
    Ruano F; Hefetz A; Lenoir A; Francke W; Tinaut A
    J Insect Physiol; 2005 Oct; 51(10):1158-64. PubMed ID: 16076474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.