These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19243614)

  • 1. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.
    Huang VS; Krakauer JW
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 6():5. PubMed ID: 19243614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.
    Daly JJ; Ruff RL
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2007 Dec; 7():2031-45. PubMed ID: 18167618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke: does spontaneous recovery have a limited impact on outcome?
    Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 24029005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted therapy for arm recovery for stroke patients: state of the art and clinical implication.
    Morone G; Cocchi I; Paolucci S; Iosa M
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Mar; 17(3):223-233. PubMed ID: 32107946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
    Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation.
    Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 May; 20(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 22623406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke.
    Takahashi CD; Der-Yeghiaian L; Le V; Motiwala RR; Cramer SC
    Brain; 2008 Feb; 131(Pt 2):425-37. PubMed ID: 18156154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery.
    Reinkensmeyer DJ; Burdet E; Casadio M; Krakauer JW; Kwakkel G; Lang CE; Swinnen SP; Ward NS; Schweighofer N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13(1):42. PubMed ID: 27130577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.
    Park JH; Park G; Kim HY; Lee JY; Ham Y; Hwang D; Kwon S; Shin JH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 33076952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A small-scale robotic manipulandum for motor training in stroke rats.
    Vigaru B; Lambercy O; Graber L; Fluit R; Wespe P; Schubring-Giese M; Luft A; Gassert R
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975349. PubMed ID: 22275553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery.
    Colombo R; Cusmano I; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1020-9. PubMed ID: 24760936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation.
    Rosati G; Gallina P; Masiero S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Dec; 15(4):560-9. PubMed ID: 18198714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving robotics for neurorehabilitation: enhancing engagement, performance, and learning with auditory feedback.
    Rosati G; Oscari F; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Secoli R; Avanzini F; Spagnol S; Masiero S
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975373. PubMed ID: 22275577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 17626223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic approaches for rehabilitation of hand function after stroke.
    Lum PS; Godfrey SB; Brokaw EB; Holley RJ; Nichols D
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S242-54. PubMed ID: 23080040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracking motor improvement at the subtask level during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Panarese A; Colombo R; Sterpi I; Pisano F; Micera S
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2012 Sep; 26(7):822-33. PubMed ID: 22374174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice.
    Fasoli SE; Krebs HI; Hogan N
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2004; 11(4):11-9. PubMed ID: 15592986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
    Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurocognitive robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function: a randomized control trial on motor recovery in subacute stroke.
    Ranzani R; Lambercy O; Metzger JC; Califfi A; Regazzi S; Dinacci D; Petrillo C; Rossi P; Conti FM; Gassert R
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 17(1):115. PubMed ID: 32831097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.
    Duret C; Mazzoleni S
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28505985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.