155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19243680)
1. The impact of omitting the interaction between crossed factors in cross-classified random effects modelling.
Shi Y; Leite W; Algina J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):1-15. PubMed ID: 19243680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors.
Siemer M; Joormann J
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):497-517. PubMed ID: 14664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MCMC estimation for the p(2) network regression model with crossed random effects.
Zijlstra BJ; van Duijn MA; Snijders TA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):143-66. PubMed ID: 19208289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: a Gibbs sampling approach.
Faucett CL; Thomas DC
Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(15):1663-85. PubMed ID: 8858789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When can group level clustering be ignored? Multilevel models versus single-level models with sparse data.
Clarke P
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Aug; 62(8):752-8. PubMed ID: 18621963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling sources of variation and risk factors for spinal deformity in farmed Atlantic salmon using hierarchical- and cross-classified multilevel models.
Aunsmo A; Øvretveit S; Breck O; Valle PS; Larssen RB; Sandberg M
Prev Vet Med; 2009 Jul; 90(1-2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19443064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling partially cross-classified multilevel data.
Luo W; Cappaert KJ; Ning L
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):342-62. PubMed ID: 25773173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robustness of a parametric model for informatively censored bivariate longitudinal data under misspecification of its distributional assumptions: A simulation study.
Pantazis N; Touloumi G
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5473-85. PubMed ID: 18058854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Random effects probit and logistic regression models for three-level data.
Gibbons RD; Hedeker D
Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1527-37. PubMed ID: 9423267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two confidence interval approaches on the dependability coefficient in a two-factor crossed design.
Ting N; Cappelleri JC; Bushmakin AG
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 20183429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simulation study to assess statistical methods for binary repeated measures data.
Masaoud E; Stryhn H
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Feb; 93(2-3):81-97. PubMed ID: 20004989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Smooth bootstrap methods for analysis of longitudinal data.
Li Y; Wang YG
Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):937-53. PubMed ID: 17701950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A correlated random-effects model for normal longitudinal data with nonignorable missingness.
Lin H; Liu D; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 19941316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Monte Carlo study of the impact of missing data and differential item functioning on theta estimates from two polytomous Rasch family models.
Furlow CF; Fouladi RT; Gagne P; Whittaker TA
J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):388-403. PubMed ID: 18250525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-stage methods for the analysis of pooled data.
Stukel TA; Demidenko E; Dykes J; Karagas MR
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2115-30. PubMed ID: 11439425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
