139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19243915)
1. Analyses of speech intelligibility in patients after glossectomy and reconstruction with fasciocutaneous/myocutaneous flaps.
Matsui Y; Shirota T; Yamashita Y; Ohno K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 19243915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of determinants on speech function after glossectomy.
Sun J; Weng Y; Li J; Wang G; Zhang Z
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):1944-50. PubMed ID: 17884520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Articulatory function in patients receiving glossectomy followed by reconstruction with a recto-abdominal myocutaneous free flap].
Ikema Y; Tsukuda M; Mochimatsu I; Kawai S; Enomoto H; Zhou LX; Yoshida T; Hirose H
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jun; 99(6):859-68. PubMed ID: 8753071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech after partial glossectomy: a comparison between reconstruction and nonreconstruction patients.
Chuanjun C; Zhiyuan Z; Shaopu G; Xinquan J; Zhihong Z
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 60(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 11928097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors influencing postoperative speech function of tongue cancer patients following reconstruction with fasciocutaneous/myocutaneous flaps--a multicenter study.
Matsui Y; Ohno K; Yamashita Y; Takahashi K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):601-9. PubMed ID: 17363217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term functional outcomes after resection of tongue cancer: determining the optimal reconstruction method.
Ji YB; Cho YH; Song CM; Kim YH; Kim JT; Ahn HC; Tae K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 274(10):3751-3756. PubMed ID: 28748261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the articulation after glossectomy.
Wakumoto M; Ohno K; Imai S; Yamashita Y; Akizuki H; Michi KI
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Nov; 23(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 8953481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A strategic approach for tongue reconstruction to achieve predictable and improved functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Engel H; Huang JJ; Lin CY; Lam W; Kao HK; Gazyakan E; Cheng MH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Dec; 126(6):1967-1977. PubMed ID: 21124135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radial forearm free flap for reconstruction of a large defect after radical ablation of carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth: some new modifications.
Song XM; Ye JH; Yuan Y; Zhang SY; Jiang HB; Wu YN
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 72(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20453547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech intelligibility after glossectomy and speech rehabilitation.
Furia CL; Kowalski LP; Latorre MR; Angelis EC; Martins NM; Barros AP; Ribeiro KC
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Jul; 127(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 11448366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech evaluation after palatal augmentation in patients undergoing glossectomy.
de Carvalho-Teles V; Sennes LU; Gielow I
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Oct; 134(10):1066-70. PubMed ID: 18936352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tongue reconstruction with free radial forearm flap after hemiglossectomy: a functional assessment.
Hsiao HT; Leu YS; Lin CC
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2003 Apr; 19(3):137-42. PubMed ID: 12806572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of size difference between hemiglossectomy and reconstruction flap on oral functions: A retrospective cohort study.
Sakakibara A; Kusumoto J; Sakakibara S; Hasegawa T; Akashi M; Minamikawa T; Furudoi S; Hashikawa K; Komori T
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jul; 72(7):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30930123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional comparison after reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap or a pectoralis major flap for cancer of the tongue.
Su WF; Hsia YJ; Chang YC; Chen SG; Sheng H
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Mar; 128(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 12646846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microvascular free tissue transfer for tongue reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: a functional assessment of radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh flap.
de Vicente JC; de Villalaín L; Torre A; Peña I
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2270-5. PubMed ID: 18940491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: functional assessment of swallowing and speech.
Hsiao HT; Leu YS; Liu CJ; Tung KY; Lin CC
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2008 Feb; 24(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 18415928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term functional outcomes after total tongue reconstruction: Consideration of flap types, volume, and functional results.
Jeong WH; Lee WJ; Roh TS; Lew DH; Yun IS
Microsurgery; 2017 Mar; 37(3):190-196. PubMed ID: 26118978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The chimeric medial sural artery perforator flap as the ideal for partial tongue reconstruction: A case series and technical refinements.
Ooi ASH; Ng MJM; Sudirman SRB; Chang D
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(10):2613-2621. PubMed ID: 33972203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pedicled Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap Versus Free Radial Forearm Flap for Tongue Reconstruction Following Hemiglossectomy.
Zhang S; Chen W; Cao G; Dong Z
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):e527-30. PubMed ID: 26335316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the suitability of medial sural artery perforator flaps in tongue reconstruction - An outcome study.
Hung SY; Loh CY; Kwon SH; Tsai CH; Chang KP; Kao HK
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171570. PubMed ID: 28182639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
