273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19244039)
1. Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 19244039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Breast cancer subtypes based on ER/PR and Her2 expression: comparison of MR imaging features].
Hao L; Yu RS; Cui F; Ren XC; Xu HB; Xu KY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 93(11):819-23. PubMed ID: 23859386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of triple-negative breast cancer.
Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2011 Jul; 18(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 21181317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deconvolution-based dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast tumors: correlation of tumor blood flow with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and clinicopathologic findings--preliminary results.
Makkat S; Luypaert R; Stadnik T; Bourgain C; Sourbron S; Dujardin M; De Greve J; De Mey J
Radiology; 2008 Nov; 249(2):471-82. PubMed ID: 18780825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers.
Sung JS; Jochelson MS; Brennan S; Joo S; Wen YH; Moskowitz C; Zheng J; Dershaw DD; Morris EA
Breast J; 2013; 19(6):643-9. PubMed ID: 24015869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: correlation between MR findings and histologic grade.
Yabuuchi H; Soeda H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Eguchi T; Sakai S; Kuroki S; Tokunaga E; Ohno S; Nishiyama K; Hatakenaka M; Honda H
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):702-9. PubMed ID: 17032912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression.
Wang Y; Ikeda DM; Narasimhan B; Longacre TA; Bleicher RJ; Pal S; Jackman RJ; Jeffrey SS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 18180338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers.
Koo HR; Cho N; Song IC; Kim H; Chang JM; Yi A; Yun BL; Moon WK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 22392859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging features in triple-negative breast cancer: comparison with luminal and HER2-overexpressing tumors.
Costantini M; Belli P; Distefano D; Bufi E; Matteo MD; Rinaldi P; Giuliani M; Petrone G; Magno S; Bonomo L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Oct; 12(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 23040001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors.
Chang YW; Kwon KH; Choi DL; Lee DW; Lee MH; Lee HK; Yang SB; Kim Y; Seo DY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):990-8. PubMed ID: 19863408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apocrine carcinoma as triple-negative breast cancer: novel definition of apocrine-type carcinoma as estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative and androgen receptor-positive invasive ductal carcinoma.
Tsutsumi Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 42(5):375-86. PubMed ID: 22450930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inference of the Basal epithelial phenotype in breast carcinoma from differential marker expression, using tissue microarrays in triple negative breast cancer and women younger than 35.
Nassar A; Sussman ZM; Lawson D; Cohen C
Breast J; 2012 Sep; 18(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 22882580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathologic features and molecular phenotype by patient age in a large cohort of young women with breast cancer.
Collins LC; Marotti JD; Gelber S; Cole K; Ruddy K; Kereakoglow S; Brachtel EF; Schapira L; Come SE; Winer EP; Partridge AH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):1061-6. PubMed ID: 22080245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The lactating breast: contrast-enhanced MR imaging of normal tissue and cancer.
Espinosa LA; Daniel BL; Vidarsson L; Zakhour M; Ikeda DM; Herfkens RJ
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 16244250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can breast cancer molecular subtype help to select patients for preoperative MR imaging?
Grimm LJ; Johnson KS; Marcom PK; Baker JA; Soo MS
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 25325325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells according to immunohistochemically defined molecular subtypes in advanced breast cancer.
Munzone E; Botteri E; Sandri MT; Esposito A; Adamoli L; Zorzino L; Sciandivasci A; Cassatella MC; Rotmensz N; Aurilio G; Curigliano G; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Oct; 12(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 23040002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Topoisomerase II alpha expression and the Ki-67 labeling index correlate with prognostic factors in estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor type-2-negative breast cancer.
Tokiniwa H; Horiguchi J; Takata D; Kikuchi M; Rokutanda N; Nagaoka R; Sato A; Odawara H; Tozuka K; Oyama T; Takeyoshi I
Breast Cancer; 2012 Oct; 19(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 21725655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can MR imaging be used to predict tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcoma?
Zhao F; Ahlawat S; Farahani SJ; Weber KL; Montgomery EA; Carrino JA; Fayad LM
Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 24611604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1724-34. PubMed ID: 22527371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
