189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19244063)
1. Gynecologic imaging reporting and data system: a new proposal for classifying adnexal masses on the basis of sonographic findings.
Amor F; Vaccaro H; Alcázar JL; León M; Craig JM; Martinez J
J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Mar; 28(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 19244063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study.
Amor F; Alcázar JL; Vaccaro H; León M; Iturra A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 21465605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of the gynecology imaging reporting and data system (GI-RADS) with the ovarian malignancy marker CA-125 in preoperative adnexal tumor assessment.
Migda M; Bartosz M; Migda MS; Kierszk M; Katarzyna G; Maleńczyk M
J Ovarian Res; 2018 Nov; 11(1):92. PubMed ID: 30390688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS): diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement.
Basha MAA; Refaat R; Ibrahim SA; Madkour NM; Awad AM; Mohamed EM; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Dawoud HA; Khamis MEM; Mohamed HAE; El-Maghraby AM; Abdalla AAEM; Assy MM; Nada MG; Obaya AA; Abdelbary EH
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):5981-5990. PubMed ID: 30993433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of gynecology imaging reporting and data system in evaluation of adnexal lesions.
Behnamfar F; Adibi A; Khadra H; Moradi M
J Res Med Sci; 2019; 24():57. PubMed ID: 31523243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Efficiency of Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System Combined With 3-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Scoring System in Evaluating Ovarian Tumor.
Yang L; Lv G; Chen H; Yang S; Liao J; Zhang W; Ke L
Ultrasound Q; 2020 Dec; 36(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 33298775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of GI-RADS and 3D-CEUS for differential diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Wang X; Yang S; Lv G; Liao J; Wu S; Zhang W
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2019 Aug; 65(7):959-964. PubMed ID: 31389505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and ADNEX for Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: An External Validation Study Conducted by Junior Sonologists.
Lai HW; Lyu GR; Kang Z; Li LY; Zhang Y; Huang YJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 34549454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian probability of malignancy with BI-RADS sonographic features.
Bouzghar G; Levenback BJ; Sultan LR; Venkatesh SS; Cwanger A; Conant EF; Sehgal CM
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):641-8. PubMed ID: 24658943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of 2- and 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced transvaginal sonography for diagnosis of small adnexal masses.
Hu R; Xiang H; Mu Y; Feng Y; Gu L; Liu H
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1889-99. PubMed ID: 25336475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new computer-aided diagnostic tool for non-invasive characterisation of malignant ovarian masses: results of a multicentre validation study.
Lucidarme O; Akakpo JP; Granberg S; Sideri M; Levavi H; Schneider A; Autier P; Nir D; Bleiberg H;
Eur Radiol; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1822-30. PubMed ID: 20306081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the diagnostic value of using serum CA125 and GI-RADS system in the evaluation of adnexal masses.
Zheng H; Tie Y; Wang X; Yang Y; Wei X; Zhao X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(7):e14577. PubMed ID: 30762809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using relevance feedback to reduce the semantic gap in content-based image retrieval of mammographic masses.
Rosa NA; Felipe JC; Traina AJ; Traina C; Rangayyan RM; Azevedo-Marques PM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():406-9. PubMed ID: 19162679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound Image Discrimination between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses Based on a Neural Network Approach.
Aramendía-Vidaurreta V; Cabeza R; Villanueva A; Navallas J; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 26715189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The diagnostic performance of the Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS) in adnexal masses.
Guo W; Zou X; Xu H; Zhang T; Zhao Y; Gao L; Duan W; Ma X; Zhang L
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Mar; 9(5):398. PubMed ID: 33842619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gynecologic Imaging and Reporting Data System for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Rodriguez-Guzman L; Vara J; Amor F; Diaz L; Vaccaro H
Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 75(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 36790399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
