BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19244504)

  • 1. Comparison of hollow-fiber ultrafiltration to the USEPA VIRADEL technique and USEPA method 1623.
    Hill VR; Polaczyk AL; Kahler AM; Cromeans TL; Hahn D; Amburgey JE
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(2):822-5. PubMed ID: 19244504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of 1MDS electropositive microfilters for simultaneous recovery of multiple microbe classes from tap water.
    Polaczyk AL; Roberts JM; Hill VR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Feb; 68(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 17027108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for simultaneous recovery of viruses, bacteria and parasites from reclaimed water.
    Liu P; Hill VR; Hahn D; Johnson TB; Pan Y; Jothikumar N; Moe CL
    J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Jan; 88(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 22108496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of hollow-fiber ultrafiltration primary concentration of pathogens and secondary concentration of viruses from water.
    Rhodes ER; Hamilton DW; See MJ; Wymer L
    J Virol Methods; 2011 Sep; 176(1-2):38-45. PubMed ID: 21664379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrafiltration-based techniques for rapid and simultaneous concentration of multiple microbe classes from 100-L tap water samples.
    Polaczyk AL; Narayanan J; Cromeans TL; Hahn D; Roberts JM; Amburgey JE; Hill VR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2008 May; 73(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 18395278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multistate evaluation of an ultrafiltration-based procedure for simultaneous recovery of enteric microbes in 100-liter tap water samples.
    Hill VR; Kahler AM; Jothikumar N; Johnson TB; Hahn D; Cromeans TL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 73(13):4218-25. PubMed ID: 17483281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia--incidence in surface and drinking water--significance and detection].
    Wagner C; Kimmig P
    Gesundheitswesen; 1992 Nov; 54(11):662-5. PubMed ID: 1286249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement of recoveries for the determination of protozoa Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water using method 1623.
    Hu J; Feng Y; Ong SL; Ng WJ; Song L; Tan X; Chu X
    J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Sep; 58(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 15279936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of ultrafiltration cartridges for a water sampling apparatus.
    Holowecky PM; James RR; Lorch DP; Straka SE; Lindquist HD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 106(3):738-47. PubMed ID: 19191977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recovery and viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Giardia intestinalis cysts using the membrane dissolution procedure.
    McCuin RM; Bukhari Z; Clancy JL
    Can J Microbiol; 2000 Aug; 46(8):700-7. PubMed ID: 10941515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drinking water treatment processes for removal of Cryptosporidium and Giardia.
    Betancourt WQ; Rose JB
    Vet Parasitol; 2004 Dec; 126(1-2):219-34. PubMed ID: 15567586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of traditional and molecular analytical methods for detecting biological agents in raw and drinking water following ultrafiltration.
    Francy DS; Bushon RN; Brady AM; Bertke EE; Kephart CM; Likirdopulos CA; Mailot BE; Schaefer FW; Lindquist HD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 107(5):1479-91. PubMed ID: 19426268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of bathers on levels of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Giardia lamblia cysts in recreational beach waters.
    Sunderland D; Graczyk TK; Tamang L; Breysse PN
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3483-9. PubMed ID: 17583766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evaluation of hollow-fiber ultrafiltration and celite concentration of enteroviruses, adenoviruses and bacteriophage from different water matrices.
    Rhodes ER; Huff EM; Hamilton DW; Jones JL
    J Virol Methods; 2016 Feb; 228():31-8. PubMed ID: 26562058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient and predictable recovery of viruses from water by small scale ultrafiltration systems.
    Winona LJ; Ommani AW; Olszewski J; Nuzzo JB; Oshima KH
    Can J Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 47(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 11766052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Giardia and Cryptosporidium in source waters of São Paulo State, Brazil.
    Hachich EM; Sato MI; Galvani AT; Menegon JR; Mucci JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 15318516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Portable continuous flow centrifugation and method 1623 for monitoring of waterborne protozoa from large volumes of various water matrices.
    Zuckerman U; Tzipori S
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 100(6):1220-7. PubMed ID: 16696669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a rapid method for simultaneous recovery of diverse microbes in drinking water by ultrafiltration with sodium polyphosphate and surfactants.
    Hill VR; Polaczyk AL; Hahn D; Narayanan J; Cromeans TL; Roberts JM; Amburgey JE
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 71(11):6878-84. PubMed ID: 16269722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aerobic spore-forming bacteria for assessing quality of drinking water produced from surface water.
    Mazoua S; Chauveheid E
    Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5186-98. PubMed ID: 16280148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of electropositive filtration for recovering norovirus in water.
    Lee H; Kim M; Paik SY; Lee CH; Jheong WH; Kim J; Ko G
    J Water Health; 2011 Mar; 9(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 21301112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.