231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19245598)
1. Vulnerability as a regulatory category in human subject research.
Coleman CH
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 19245598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vulnerability in research: individuals with limited financial and/or social resources.
Grady C
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 19245599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The vulnerability of the very sick.
Menikoff J
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19245602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limited English proficiency and disparities in clinical research.
Bustillos D
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 19245600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vulnerability, vulnerable populations, and policy.
Ruof MC
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2004 Dec; 14(4):411-25. PubMed ID: 15812988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction: Vulnerability in biomedical research.
Iltis AS
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 19245597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Human experimentation in developing countries: improving international practices by identifying vulnerable populations and allocating fair benefits.
Farrell K
J Health Care Law Policy; 2006; 9(1):136-61. PubMed ID: 17165228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulations limiting medical research in prisons remains necessary.
Geller AL
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):72-3. PubMed ID: 16619451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal Research Regulations for the 21st Century.
Lo B; Barnes M
N Engl J Med; 2016 Mar; 374(13):1205-7. PubMed ID: 27028910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vulnerable brains: research ethics and neurosurgical patients.
Ford PJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2009; 37(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 19245604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CIOMS guidelines remain conservative about vulnerability and social justice.
Ho CW
Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 28661402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulating Research and experimentation: a view from the U.K.
McLean SA
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(4):604-12. PubMed ID: 15807349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experimentation.
Lerner BH
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):1806-7. PubMed ID: 17476006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Vulnerability in human subject research: existential state, not category designation.
Finder SG
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):68-70; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.
Cook-Deegan RM
Cerebrum; 2000; 2(2):73-91. PubMed ID: 15986545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Best practice & research in anaesthesiology issue on new approaches in clinical research ethics in clinical research.
Schwenzer KJ
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):569-82. PubMed ID: 22099922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harmonizing regulations for biomedical research: a critical analysis of the US and Venezuelan systems.
Di Tillio-Gonzalez D; Fischbach RL
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 17488491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vulnerable populations in research.
Miracle VA
Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2010; 29(5):242-5. PubMed ID: 20703134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
