BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19245824)

  • 1. The use of E-scores to determine the quality of protein alignments.
    Silvanovich A; Bannon G; McClain S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S26-31. PubMed ID: 19245824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further evaluation of the utility of "sliding window" FASTA in predicting cross-reactivity with allergenic proteins.
    Cressman RF; Ladics G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S20-5. PubMed ID: 19114081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of conventional FASTA identity searches with the 80 amino acid sliding window FASTA search for the elucidation of potential identities to known allergens.
    Ladics GS; Bannon GA; Silvanovich A; Cressman RF
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2007 Aug; 51(8):985-98. PubMed ID: 17639511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of short amino acid sequence matches for prediction of protein allergenicity.
    Silvanovich A; Nemeth MA; Song P; Herman R; Tagliani L; Bannon GA
    Toxicol Sci; 2006 Mar; 90(1):252-8. PubMed ID: 16338955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lack of cross-reactivity between the Bacillus thuringiensis derived protein Cry1F in maize grain and dust mite Der p7 protein with human sera positive for Der p7-IgE.
    Ladics GS; Bardina L; Cressman RF; Mattsson JL; Sampson HA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 16406630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performing IgE serum testing due to bioinformatics matches in the allergenicity assessment of GM crops.
    Goodman RE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 46 Suppl 10():S24-34. PubMed ID: 18715545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical and predictive bioinformatics methods for the identification of potentially cross-reactive protein matches.
    Goodman RE
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2006 Jul; 50(7):655-60. PubMed ID: 16810734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioinformatic methods for allergenicity assessment using a comprehensive allergen database.
    Hileman RE; Silvanovich A; Goodman RE; Rice EA; Holleschak G; Astwood JD; Hefle SL
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2002 Aug; 128(4):280-91. PubMed ID: 12218366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying food proteins with allergenic potential: evolution of approaches to safety assessment and research to provide additional tools.
    Ladics GS; Selgrade MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S2-6. PubMed ID: 19028539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assessment of multiple criteria for the in silico prediction of cross-reactivity of proteins to known allergens.
    Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Ladics GS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23933007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural relatedness of plant food allergens with specific reference to cross-reactive allergens: an in silico analysis.
    Jenkins JA; Griffiths-Jones S; Shewry PR; Breiteneder H; Mills EN
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Jan; 115(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 15637564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety assessment by in vitro digestibility and allergenicity of genetically modified maize with an amaranth 11S globulin.
    Sinagawa-García SR; Rascón-Cruz Q; Valdez-Ortiz A; Medina-Godoy S; Escobar-Gutiérrez A; Paredes-López O
    J Agric Food Chem; 2004 May; 52(9):2709-14. PubMed ID: 15113180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
    Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioinformatics and the allergy assessment of agricultural biotechnology products: industry practices and recommendations.
    Ladics GS; Cressman RF; Herouet-Guicheney C; Herman RA; Privalle L; Song P; Ward JM; McClain S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Jun; 60(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21320564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review.
    Goodman RE; Hefle SL; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2005 Jun; 137(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 15947471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of bioinformatic approaches for predicting allergen cross reactivity.
    Herman RA; Song P
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 132():110656. PubMed ID: 31279045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
    Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
    Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of global sequence comparison and one-to-one FASTA local alignment in regulatory allergenicity assessment of transgenic proteins in food crops.
    Song P; Herman RA; Kumpatla S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 71():142-8. PubMed ID: 24953553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational allergenicity prediction of transgenic proteins expressed in genetically modified crops.
    Verma AK; Misra A; Subash S; Das M; Dwivedi PD
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 2011 Sep; 33(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 20964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.