255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19245877)
1. Semi-parametric additive risk models: application to injury duration study.
Lim HJ; Zhang X
Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Mar; 41(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 19245877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations.
Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cox proportional hazards models have more statistical power than logistic regression models in cross-sectional genetic association studies.
van der Net JB; Janssens AC; Eijkemans MJ; Kastelein JJ; Sijbrands EJ; Steyerberg EW
Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Sep; 16(9):1111-6. PubMed ID: 18382476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fitting semiparametric additive hazards models using standard statistical software.
Schaubel DE; Wei G
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):719-30. PubMed ID: 17638295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: an analysis based on competing risks Markov chains and additive regression models.
Rosato R; Ciccone G; Bo S; Pagano GF; Merletti F; Gregori D
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 17518809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced-rank hazard regression for modelling non-proportional hazards.
Perperoglou A; le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2831-45. PubMed ID: 16158396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating hospital costs in type 2 diabetes care: does the choice of the model matter?
Gregori D; Pagano E; Rosato R; Bo S; Zigon G; Merletti F
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1965-71. PubMed ID: 17022856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Test for additive interaction in proportional hazards models.
Li R; Chambless L
Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 17(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 17320789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Mizon-Richard encompassing test for the Cox and Aalen additive hazards models.
Martinussen T; Aalen OO; Scheike TH
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 17608786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Additive risk models for survival data with high-dimensional covariates.
Ma S; Kosorok MR; Fine JP
Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 16542247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.
Bender R; Augustin T; Blettner M
Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1713-23. PubMed ID: 15724232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methods for analyzing recurrent events data: application to the Emergency Department Visits of Pediatric Firearm Victims.
Lim HJ; Liu J; Melzer-Lange M
Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Mar; 39(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 17045949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival models using restrictive cubic spline functions.
Bolard P; Quantin C; Abrahamowicz M; Esteve J; Giorgi R; Chadha-Boreham H; Binquet C; Faivre J
J Cancer Epidemiol Prev; 2002; 7(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 12665210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing alternative models: log vs Cox proportional hazard?
Basu A; Manning WG; Mullahy J
Health Econ; 2004 Aug; 13(8):749-65. PubMed ID: 15322988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the results of Cox proportional hazards model and parametric models in the study of length of stay in a tertiary teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran.
Ravangard R; Arab M; Rashidian A; Akbarisari A; Zare A; Zeraati H
Acta Med Iran; 2011; 49(10):650-8. PubMed ID: 22071639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A regression survival model for testing the proportional hazards hypothesis.
Quantin C; Moreau T; Asselain B; Maccario J; Lellouch J
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):874-85. PubMed ID: 8924576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polynomial spline estimation and inference of proportional hazards regression models with flexible relative risk form.
Huang JZ; Liu L
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):793-802. PubMed ID: 16984322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proper modeling strategies selection for the assessment of post-infarction costs.
Gregori D; Desideri A; Bigi R; Petrinco M; Cortigiani L; Zigon G; Pagano E
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 129(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 17707925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Path consistent model selection in additive risk model via Lasso.
Leng C; Ma S
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(20):3753-70. PubMed ID: 17309043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models for survival analysis.
Orbe J; Ferreira E; Núñez-Antón V
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3493-510. PubMed ID: 12407686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
