These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19246051)
1. Re: the value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses: B. A. Shannon, R. J. Cohen, H. de Bruto and R. J. Davies J Urol 2008; 180: 1257-1261. Park BK; Kim CK J Urol; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1959-60; author reply 1960. PubMed ID: 19246051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses. Shannon BA; Cohen RJ; de Bruto H; Davies RJ J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1257-61; discussion 1261. PubMed ID: 18707712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidental renal tumours: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy. Vasudevan A; Davies RJ; Shannon BA; Cohen RJ BJU Int; 2006 May; 97(5):946-9. PubMed ID: 16643475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidental renal tumours: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of preoperative core biopsy. Somani BK; Nabi G BJU Int; 2006 Aug; 98(2):465-6. PubMed ID: 16879699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Renal mass biopsy--a renaissance? B. R. Lane, M. K. Samplaski, B. R. Herts, M. Zhou, A. C. Novick and S. C. Campbell J Urol 2008; 179: 20-27. Park BK J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2386. PubMed ID: 19303098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Wang R; Wolf JS; Wood DP; Higgins EJ; Hafez KS Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):586-90; discussion 590-1. PubMed ID: 19118884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Renal masses and indication to nephrectomy: preoperative assessment and clinical presentation of five cases]. Vedana M; Geisler S; Zellweger T; Gasser T Rev Med Suisse; 2013 Nov; 9(407):2184-8. PubMed ID: 24354254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Percutaneous and laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal masses. D. S. Finley, S. Beck, G. Box, W. Chu, L. Deane, D. J. Vajgrt, E. M. McDougall and R. V. Clayman. J Urol 2008; 180: 492-498. Demirci DA; Akbulut Z; Balbay MD J Urol; 2009 Jun; 181(6):2827; author reply 2827-8. PubMed ID: 19375755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses: C. J. Weight, B. T. Larson, A. F. Fergany, T. Gao, B. R. Lane, S. C. Campbell, J. H. Kaouk, E. A. Klein and A. C. Novick J Urol 2010; 183: 1317-1323. Patel N; Sullivan M; Cranston D J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2213-4; author reply 2214. PubMed ID: 20864134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Uselessness of percutaneous core needle renal biopsy in the management of small renal masses. Pusiol T; Zorzi MG; Morichetti D; Piscioli I; Scialpi M Urol Int; 2011; 87(1):125-6. PubMed ID: 21701144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The current management of small renal masses. Trinh QD; Saad F; Lattouf JB Curr Opin Support Palliat Care; 2009 Sep; 3(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 19553818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current role, techniques and outcomes of percutaneous biopsy of renal tumors. Volpe A; Jewett MA Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2009 Jun; 9(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 19496714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: Mesut Remzi, Michael Marberger. Renal tumor biopsies for evaluation of small renal tumors: why, in whom, and how? Eur urol 2009;55:359-67. Park BK Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):e99-100; author reply e101-2. PubMed ID: 19286305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolving role of renal biopsy in small renal masses. Wang R; Wood DP Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(3):332-4. PubMed ID: 19414125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: A retrospective comparison of 2 methods of intraoperative margin evaluation during partial nephrectomy: I. S. Hagemann and J. S. Lewis, Jr. J Urol 2009; 181: 500-505. Hubbard R; Ducey T; Kercher K; Teigland C J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1231. PubMed ID: 19628232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Paul L. Crispen, Michael L. Blute. Do percutaneous renal tumor biopsies at initial presentation affect treatment strategies? Eur Urol 2009;55:307-9. Park BK Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):e105-6. PubMed ID: 19297078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biopsy of a renal mass: where are we now? Laguna MP; Kümmerlin I; Rioja J; de la Rosette JJ Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Sep; 19(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 19571757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features: R. J. Cohen, B. A. Shannon, M. Phillips, R. E. Moorin, T. M. Wheeler and K. L. Garrett J Urol 2008; 179: 1762-1767. Mai KT; Veinot JP J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2714; author reply 214-5. PubMed ID: 18951578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Re: The number of cores positive for high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial biopsy is associated with prostate cancer on second biopsy: C. De Nunzio, A. Trucchi, R. Miano, A. Stoppacciaro, H. Fattahi, A. Cicione and A. Tubaro J Urol 2009; 181: 1069-1075. Brimo F; Vollmer RT; Bismar TA J Urol; 2009 Oct; 182(4):1653; author reply 1653-4. PubMed ID: 19683763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]