These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19246169)

  • 1. Correlation between US-PSV and MDCTA in the quantification of carotid artery stenosis.
    Saba L; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Mallarini G
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 19246169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between US-PSV and 64-Row MDCTA with Advanced Vessel Analysis in the Quantification of 50-70% Carotid Artery Stenosis.
    Stefanini M; Gaspari E; Boi L; Del Giudice C; Mastrangeli R; Nucera F; Simonetti G
    Int J Vasc Med; 2012; 2012():928638. PubMed ID: 22577554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography.
    Saba L; Mallarini G
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19464837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis.
    AbuRahma AF; Abu-Halimah S; Bensenhaver J; Dean LS; Keiffer T; Emmett M; Flaherty S
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 48(3):589-94. PubMed ID: 18586444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria.
    Stanziale SF; Wholey MH; Boules TN; Selzer F; Makaroun MS
    J Endovasc Ther; 2005 Jun; 12(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 15943510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials.
    AbuRahma AF; Robinson PA; Strickler DL; Alberts S; Young L
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 Jul; 12(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 9676932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carotid artery stenosis quantification: concordance analysis between radiologist and semi-automatic computer software by using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography.
    Saba L; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Calleo G; Mallarini G
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 20031358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Goldstein J; Chakhtoura EY; Durán WN
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 39(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 14718815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT angiography-derived duplex ultrasound velocity criteria in patients with carotid artery stenosis.
    Doyle AJ; Stone JJ; Carnicelli AP; Chandra A; Gillespie DL
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Jul; 28(5):1219-26. PubMed ID: 24456865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement.
    van Prehn J; Muhs BE; Pramanik B; Ollenschleger M; Rockman CB; Cayne NS; Adelman MA; Jacobowitz GR; Maldonado TS
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 36(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18585935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of color Doppler with multidetector CT angiography findings in carotid artery stenosis.
    Savic ZN; Davidovic LB; Sagic DZ; Brajovic MD; Popovic SS
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2010 Sep; 10():1818-25. PubMed ID: 20852825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
    Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences between MIP and MPR techniques in the carotid artery stenosis degree measurement. Evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiograph.
    Saba L; Mallarini G
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 18432165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposed duplex velocity criteria for carotid restenosis following carotid endarterectomy with patch closure.
    AbuRahma AF; Stone P; Deem S; Dean LS; Keiffer T; Deem E
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Aug; 50(2):286-91, 291.e1-2; discussion 291. PubMed ID: 19631861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study.
    Chen JC; Salvian AJ; Taylor DC; Teal PA; Marotta TR; Hsiang YN
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 9588510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simplified ultrasound protocol for the exclusion of clinically significant carotid artery stenosis.
    Högberg D; Dellagrammaticas D; Kragsterman B; Björck M; Wanhainen A
    Ups J Med Sci; 2016 Aug; 121(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 27379448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement between multidetector-row CT angiography and ultrasound echo-color Doppler in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    Saba L; Sanfilippo R; Montisci R; Mallarini G
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2008; 26(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 18836263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between quantification methods of carotid artery stenosis and computed tomographic angiography.
    Saba L; Mallarini G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 20498548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grading carotid intrastent restenosis: a 6-year follow-up study.
    Setacci C; Chisci E; Setacci F; Iacoponi F; de Donato G
    Stroke; 2008 Apr; 39(4):1189-96. PubMed ID: 18292382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.