208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19246332)
1. Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 19246332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.
Jordan TR; Fuggetta G; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23957. PubMed ID: 21935368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.
Almabruk AA; Paterson KB; McGowan V; Jordan TR
PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18131. PubMed ID: 21559084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: the evidence from Arabic.
Jordan TR; Almabruk AA; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
Cortex; 2011 Sep; 47(8):992-7. PubMed ID: 21457952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
Jordan TR; Sheen M; Abedipour L; Paterson KB
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e98273. PubMed ID: 25032950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?
Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):2004-7. PubMed ID: 19133280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Split Fovea Theory and the Leicester critique: what do the data say?
Van der Haegen L; Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 19698725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The mechanisms underlying the interhemispheric integration of information in foveal word recognition: evidence for transcortical inhibition.
Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M
Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):81-9. PubMed ID: 20430428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: a critical assessment of recent research.
Jordan TR; Paterson KB
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2341-53. PubMed ID: 18723038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foveational complexity in single word identification: contralateral visual pathways are advantaged over ipsilateral pathways.
Obregón M; Shillcock R
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3279-83. PubMed ID: 22982485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
McCormick SF; Davis CJ; Brysbaert M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemispheric representation of the central retina of commissurotomized subjects.
Sugishita M; Hamilton CR; Sakuma I; Hemmi I
Neuropsychologia; 1994 Apr; 32(4):399-415. PubMed ID: 8047248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
