214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19246349)
1. Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.
Oberauer K
Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 19246349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overwriting of phonemic features in serial recall.
Lange EB; Oberauer K
Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):333-9. PubMed ID: 15948618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age and redintegration in immediate memory and their relationship to task difficulty.
Neale K; Tehan G
Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1940-53. PubMed ID: 18265610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.
Lobley KJ; Baddeley AD; Gathercole SE
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1462-78. PubMed ID: 16365950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities.
Steinbrink C; Klatte M
Dyslexia; 2008 Nov; 14(4):271-90. PubMed ID: 17979186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.
Mueller ST; Seymour TL; Kieras DE; Meyer DE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1353-80. PubMed ID: 14622066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
Coltheart V; Langdon R
Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When meaning is useless.
Benetello A; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
Memory; 2015; 23(7):1001-12. PubMed ID: 25121998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.
Li X; Schweickert R; Gandour J
Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1116-25. PubMed ID: 11126935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptive choice between articulatory rehearsal and attentional refreshing in verbal working memory.
Camos V; Mora G; Oberauer K
Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 21264630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.
Conlin JA; Gathercole SE; Adams JW
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1434-46. PubMed ID: 16365948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
Coltheart V
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children's short-term memory: typical development and dyslexia.
Thomson JM; Richardson U; Goswami U
Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1210-9. PubMed ID: 16532854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory word serial recall benefits from orthographic dissimilarity.
Pattamadilok C; Lafontaine H; Morais J; Kolinsky R
Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 3):321-41. PubMed ID: 21033650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phonological and Semantic Contributions to Verbal Short-Term Memory in Young Children With Developmental Stuttering.
Anderson JD; Wagovich SA; Brown BT
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 62(3):644-667. PubMed ID: 30950742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concreteness effects in different tasks: implications for models of short-term memory.
Romani C; McAlpine S; Martin RC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):292-323. PubMed ID: 17853203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall.
Acheson DJ; MacDonald MC; Postle BR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):44-59. PubMed ID: 21058880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phonological similarity effect in complex span task.
Camos V; Mora G; Barrouillet P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1927-50. PubMed ID: 23419012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phonological and visuo-spatial working memory in individuals with intellectual disability.
Rosenquist C; Conners FA; Roskos-Ewoldsen B
Am J Ment Retard; 2003 Nov; 108(6):403-13. PubMed ID: 14561108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
