These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19246349)

  • 41. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Selective interference with verbal short-term memory for serial order information: a new paradigm and tests of a timing-signal hypothesis.
    Henson R; Hartley T; Burgess N; Hitch G; Flude B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1307-34. PubMed ID: 14578087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Separability of active semantic and phonological maintenance in verbal working memory.
    Nishiyama R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193808. PubMed ID: 29513731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Verbal Short-Term Memory Deficits in Chinese Children with Dyslexia may not be a Problem with the Activation of Phonological Representations.
    Zhao J; Yang Y; Song YW; Bi HY
    Dyslexia; 2015 Nov; 21(4):304-22. PubMed ID: 26437073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory.
    Gathercole SE; Frankish CR; Pickering SJ; Peaker S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 9949710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.
    Chow M; Macnamara BN; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):937-49. PubMed ID: 27048510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Phonological recoding, visual short-term store and the effect of unattended speech: evidence from a case of slowly progressive anarthria.
    Papagno C; Lucchelli F; Vallar G
    Cortex; 2008 Mar; 44(3):312-24. PubMed ID: 18387560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall.
    Hulme C; Roodenrys S; Schweickert R; Brown GD; Martin M; Stuart G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1217-32. PubMed ID: 9293631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Phonological similarity effects in simple and complex span tasks.
    Macnamara BN; Moore AB; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1174-86. PubMed ID: 21503805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Computational models of working memory: putting long-term memory into context.
    Burgess N; Hitch G
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Nov; 9(11):535-41. PubMed ID: 16213782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Positional cues in serial learning: the spin-list technique.
    Kahana MJ; Mollison MV; Addis KM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 19966242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Time and cognitive load in working memory.
    Barrouillet P; Bernardin S; Portrat S; Vergauwe E; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):570-85. PubMed ID: 17470006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Serial recall of visuospatial and verbal information with and without material-specific interference: implications for contemporary models of working memory.
    Davis LC; Rane S; Hiscock M
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):778-97. PubMed ID: 23311456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Specific reading retardation and working memory: a review.
    Jorm AF
    Br J Psychol; 1983 Aug; 74 (Pt 3)():311-42. PubMed ID: 6616125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Newly-acquired words are more phonologically robust in verbal short-term memory when they have associated semantic representations.
    Savill N; Ellis AW; Jefferies E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():85-97. PubMed ID: 26965397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: building a dog from a dart, a mop, and a fig.
    Tehan G; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):477-89. PubMed ID: 9610119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Serial and free recall in children can be improved by training: evidence for the importance of phonological and semantic representations in immediate memory tasks.
    Melby-Lervåg M; Hulme C
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1694-700. PubMed ID: 20921571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
    Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.