423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19247159)
1. Nocturnal leg cramps: a common complaint in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Matsumoto M; Watanabe K; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K; Michikawa T; Nishiwaki Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E189-94. PubMed ID: 19247159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration of bone turnover rate after decompression surgery in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary report.
Kim HJ; Lee HM; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Kim HS; Park JO; Moon ES; Park KH; Moon SH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E635-9. PubMed ID: 19680088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery.
Slover J; Abdu WA; Hanscom B; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1974-80. PubMed ID: 16924216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of patient satisfaction with symptom severity and walking ability after surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Yamashita K; Hayashi J; Ohzono K; Hiroshima K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(21):2477-81. PubMed ID: 14595167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study of symptom severity at standard intervals after surgery.
Yamashita K; Ohzono K; Hiroshima K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(13):1484-90. PubMed ID: 16741459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Herno A; Airaksinen O; Saari T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1471-4. PubMed ID: 8235818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical results in hidden lumbar spinal stenosis detected by axial loaded computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: an outcome study.
Willén J; Wessberg PJ; Danielsson B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):E109-15. PubMed ID: 18277859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.
Malmivaara A; Slätis P; Heliövaara M; Sainio P; Kinnunen H; Kankare J; Dalin-Hirvonen N; Seitsalo S; Herno A; Kortekangas P; Niinimäki T; Rönty H; Tallroth K; Turunen V; Knekt P; Härkänen T; Hurri H;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17202885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year results of X Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Siddiqui M; Smith FW; Wardlaw D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(12):1345-8. PubMed ID: 17515824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?
Mannion AF; Junge A; Elfering A; Dvorak J; Porchet F; Grob D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1590-9. PubMed ID: 19521272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years.
Chang Y; Singer DE; Wu YA; Keller RB; Atlas SJ
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 May; 53(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 15877553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in mature adults: posterolateral non-instrument-assisted lumbar decompression and fusion.
Hamilton DK; Jones-Quaidoo SM; Sansur C; Shaffrey CI; Oskouian R; Jane JA
Surg Neurol; 2008 May; 69(5):457-61; discussion 461-2. PubMed ID: 18207557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome after surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: the lumbar extension test is not a predictive factor.
Westergaard L; Hauerberg J; Springborg JB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):E930-5. PubMed ID: 19940724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
