These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19247890)
1. Back to basics in clinical research ethics. Haire B Am J Bioeth; 2009 Mar; 9(3):48-9. PubMed ID: 19247890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to open peer commentaries on "What is the best standard for the standard of care in clinical research?". van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):W7-8. PubMed ID: 19998101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing therapies less effective than the best current standard: ethical beliefs in an international sample of researchers. Kent DM; Mwamburi M; Cash RA; Rabin TL; Bennish ML Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):W11. PubMed ID: 14635629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the best standard for the standard of care in clinical research? van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ Am J Bioeth; 2009 Mar; 9(3):35-43. PubMed ID: 19247887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting of informed consent, standard of care and post-trial obligations in global randomized intervention trials: a systematic survey of registered trials. Cohen ER; O'Neill JM; Joffres M; Upshur RE; Mills E Dev World Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 18445072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposed revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Association Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Apr; No. 147():18-22. PubMed ID: 11657218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What must research subjects be told regarding the results of completed randomized trials? Markman M IRB; 2004; 26(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 15281194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Questioning the methodologic superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials. Howick J Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):34-48. PubMed ID: 19998192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposed revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Association Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Aug; No. 150():18-22. PubMed ID: 11657790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols. Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role and responsibility of industry in research. Lasagna L Dolentium Hominum; 1987; 4(2nd Yr. 1):56-9. PubMed ID: 11653199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. AIDS: bioethics and public policy. Schuklenk U New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):127-44. PubMed ID: 15706680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. To study, perchance to treat. Trachtman H Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 19180382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Equipoise may be in the eye of the beholder. Moyer A; Floyd AH Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 19180388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomization can be risky. Lott J Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 19180386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. International regulations and medical research in developing countries: double standards or differing standards? Tangwa GB Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):46-50. PubMed ID: 15282918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]