265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19248234)
1. FDA approves labor monitoring system.
Cohain JS
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (88):50. PubMed ID: 19248234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical devices; obstetrical and gynecological devices; classification of computerized labor monitoring system. Final rule.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2007 Apr; 72(78):20225-7. PubMed ID: 17520767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical devices; reclassification and codification of home uterine activity monitor. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 2001 Mar; 66(47):14074-6. PubMed ID: 11699492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical devices; effective date of requirement for premarket approval for a class III preamendments obstetrical and gynecological device. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 2000 Jul; 65(129):41330-2. PubMed ID: 11067678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Limits of detection, undesirable side-effects, and impact on labor outcome of the use of fetal electronic monitoring and tocography].
Thoulon JM
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(5):486-91. PubMed ID: 7983307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The "robotron NATALI" microcomputer-assisted birth monitoring system].
Krause W; Michels W; Volkmer H; Marx H; Kunath H
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1982 Oct; 186(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 6891150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Continuous monitoring of the fetus using an ultrasonic-Doppler-device during delivery].
Strijowa NW
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(16):1053-4. PubMed ID: 726724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fetal asphyxia at delivery].
Timonen S; Erkkola R
Duodecim; 2004; 120(20):2415-22. PubMed ID: 15641510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Food and Drug Administration meeting and the Collaborative Home Uterine Monitoring Study.
Blanco JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 176(4):954. PubMed ID: 9125632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comment to article: fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon.
Thoulon JM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Oct; 21(10):760. PubMed ID: 19012194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between the use of the partograph and birth outcomes at Korle-Bu teaching hospital.
Gans-Lartey F; O'Brien BA; Gyekye FO; Schopflocher D
Midwifery; 2013 May; 29(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 23146139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical inquiries. How does electronic fetal heart rate monitoring affect labor and delivery outcomes?
Barstow C; Gauer R; Jamieson B
J Fam Pract; 2010 Nov; 59(11):653a-b. PubMed ID: 21060906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. FDA approves watch-like device to monitor blood sugar levels.
Formanek R
FDA Consum; 2001; 35(3):7. PubMed ID: 11458558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Complex, intensive observation of the state of the fetus during the labor process].
Petrikovskiĭ BM; Barmin AA; Darkova LB
Sov Med; 1980; (8):70-4. PubMed ID: 7423245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Women's health advocates dismayed at FDA's Plan B decision.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2005 Oct; 11(10):1016. PubMed ID: 16211017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Labor management evidence update: potential to minimize risk of cesarean birth in healthy women.
Simpson KR
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2014; 28(2):108-16; quiz E1-2. PubMed ID: 24781769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDA's decision on Plan B: a surrogate for lack of commitment to women's health.
Merkatz RB
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Nov; 14(9):860. PubMed ID: 16313214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental health outcomes of abortion and its alternatives: implications for future policy.
Kornfield SL; Geller PA
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 20211428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's health policy: are the times really a-changing?
Salganicoff A
Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(5):274-6. PubMed ID: 17629498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Computer evaluation of tocograms following administration of Spasmalgan (denaverin)].
Zanke S; Seewald HJ; Michels W; Kunath H; Schubert H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(18):1182-5. PubMed ID: 362769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
