693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19248731)
1. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Cates WB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
Wilson RH; Watts KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
Wilson RH; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jun; 16(6):367-82. PubMed ID: 16178408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24 dB to 0 dB signal to babble.
Wilson RH; Abrams HB; Pillion AL
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 15074443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Nov; 14(9):453-70. PubMed ID: 14708835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word recognition of digit triplets and monosyllabic words in multitalker babble by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):385-97. PubMed ID: 16866003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers.
Wilson RH; Carnell CS; Cleghorn AL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Jun; 18(6):522-9. PubMed ID: 17849640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.
Beattie RC; Barr T; Roup C
Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 9276098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
