693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19248731)
21. Word recognition in multitalker babble measured with two psychophysical methods.
Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Sep; 16(8):622-30. PubMed ID: 16295249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
McArdle RA; Wilson RH; Burks CA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Oct; 16(9):726-39; quiz 763-4. PubMed ID: 16515143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and validation of the Speech Reception in Noise (SPRINT) Test.
Brungart DS; Walden B; Cord M; Phatak S; Theodoroff SM; Griest S; Grant KW
Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():90-97. PubMed ID: 28111321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Vaden KI; Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Teubner-Rhodes SE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 26683042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of word-recognition abilities assessed with digit pairs and digit triplets in multitalker babble.
Wilson RH; Burks CA; Weakley DG
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 16320145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Psychometric Characteristics of Spanish Monosyllabic, Bisyllabic, and Trisyllabic Words for Use in Word-Recognition Protocols.
Carlo MA; Wilson RH; Villanueva-Reyes A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):531-546. PubMed ID: 32485761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
Wilson RH; McArdle R
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations on Recognition Performance by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Wilson RH; Sharrett KC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 28054913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
Cheesman MF; Hepburn D; Armitage JC; Marshall K
Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: A clinic protocol.
Wilson RH; Burks CA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(6):839-52. PubMed ID: 16680621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in the Elderly].
von Gablenz P; Holube I
Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Nov; 96(11):759-764. PubMed ID: 29132188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report.
Wilson RH; Strouse A
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 11926322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.
Sheft S; Shafiro V; Lorenzi C; McMullen R; Farrell C
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 22790319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A demonstration of improved precision of word recognition scores.
Schlauch RS; Anderson ES; Micheyl C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):543-55. PubMed ID: 24686502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW
Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
