2783 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19249082)
21. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.
Havrilesky LJ; Leath CA; Huh W; Calingaert B; Bentley RC; Soper JT; Alvarez Secord A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 15099957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Initial experience with Dargent's operation: the radical vaginal trachelectomy.
Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Carter J; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jan; 108(1):214-9. PubMed ID: 17996284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Feasibility, morbidity, and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Vicario V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 17848319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.
Nix J; Smith A; Kurpad R; Nielsen ME; Wallen EM; Pruthi RS
Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 19853987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the management of recurrent pelvic cancer].
Jauffret C; Lambaudie E; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Houvenaeghel G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Dec; 39(12):674-80. PubMed ID: 21871833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. New surgical approaches to treatment of cervical cancer.
Hatch KD; Hallum AV; Nour M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1996; (21):71-5. PubMed ID: 9023832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy.
Pruthi RS; Wallen EM
Eur Urol; 2008 Feb; 53(2):310-22. PubMed ID: 17400365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].
Wu K; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Li H; Bai P; Li XG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 28(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16875638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):357.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18928973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.
Pluta M; Rob L; Charvat M; Chmel R; Halaska M; Skapa P; Robova H
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 19264352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
