144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19249188)
1. Rigid sigmoidoscopy and MRI are not interchangeable in determining the position of rectal cancers.
Baatrup G; Bolstad M; Mortensen JH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1169-73. PubMed ID: 19249188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rectosigmoid tumours: should we continue sitting on the fence?
Bagla N; Schofield JB
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Sep; 9(7):606-8. PubMed ID: 17824977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging predicts sphincter invasion of low rectal cancer and influences selection of operation.
Holzer B; Urban M; Hölbling N; Feil W; Novi G; Hruby W; Rosen HR; Schiessel R
Surgery; 2003 Jun; 133(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 12796734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of MRI for predicting the circumferential resection margin, mesorectal fascia invasion, and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Park HS; Eun HW; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 29(5):1093-101. PubMed ID: 19388124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the preoperative staging of rectum cancer].
Mortensen LA; Leffers AM; Holck S; Bülow S; Achiam M
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Aug; 171(35):2476-81. PubMed ID: 19732535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer (T4a) and the clinical role of MRI-evaluated neo-adjuvant downstaging.
Larsen SG; Wiig JN; Emblemsvaag HL; Grøholt KK; Hole KH; Bentsen A; Dueland S; Vetrhus T; Giercksky KE
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Sep; 11(7):759-67. PubMed ID: 18662240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: Effect of rectal distension and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumour-free circumferential resection margin.
Slater A; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Marshall M
Clin Radiol; 2006 Jan; 61(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 16356818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging of the low rectum: defining the radiological anatomy.
Salerno G; Daniels IR; Brown G
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8 Suppl 3():10-3. PubMed ID: 16813585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumor regression grade and rectal cancer.
Cho JH; Faragher IG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Mar; 53(3):362; author reply 362-3. PubMed ID: 20173488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Colo-anal anastomosis. Our experience].
Morlino A; Tramutola G; Rossi MT; Scutari F
G Chir; 2009 Mar; 30(3):100-6. PubMed ID: 19351460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and rigid rectoscopy in the preoperative identification of intra- and extraperitoneal rectal cancer.
Paparo F; Puppo C; Montale A; Bacigalupo L; Pascariello A; Clavarezza M; Binda C; Rollandi GA; Binda GA
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Nov; 16(11):O379-85. PubMed ID: 24974862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging as the method of choice to determine the distance to the anal margin in rectal cancer.
Lorenzo Liñán MÁ; García Armengol J; Martín Martín GP; Martínez Sanjuán V; Roig Vila JV
Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Dec; 100(12):772-779. PubMed ID: 36064169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers.
Han YE; Park BJ; Sung DJ; Kim MJ; Han NY; Sim KC; Cho SB; Kim J; Kim SH; An H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Feb; 46(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 32691110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphological assessment of the interface between tumor and neighboring tissues, by magnetic resonance imaging, before and after radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Torkzad MR; Suzuki C; Tanaka S; Palmer G; Holm T; Blomqvist L
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1099-103. PubMed ID: 19031179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy in determining rectal tumor proximity to the peritoneal reflection.
Sandilos G; Menger A; Kooragayala K; Zhu C; Daneshpooy S; Gefen R; Kovacs J; Giugliano DN; Kwiatt ME; McClane SJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Apr; 38(1):109. PubMed ID: 37097459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How important is rigid proctosigmoidoscopy in localizing rectal cancer?
Schoellhammer HF; Gregorian AC; Sarkisyan GG; Petrie BA
Am J Surg; 2008 Dec; 196(6):904-8; discussion 908. PubMed ID: 19095107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic versus radiology-based location of rectal cancer.
Meylemans D; Penninckx F; Vanbeckevoort D; Wolthuis AM; Fieuws S; D'Hoore A
Acta Chir Belg; 2014; 114(6):364-9. PubMed ID: 26021679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An MRI-based assessment of standard and extralevator abdominoperineal excision specimens: time for a patient tailored approach?
How P; West NP; Brown G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 21(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 24271159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the view in the rectal clinic: a randomised control trial.
Bulmer M; Hartley J; Lee PW; Duthie GS; Monson JR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 May; 82(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 10858688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sites of surgical wasting in the abdominoperineal specimen.
Salerno G; Chandler I; Wotherspoon A; Thomas K; Moran B; Brown G
Br J Surg; 2008 Sep; 95(9):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18690619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
