341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19249607)
21. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars.
Soares CJ; Soares PV; de Freitas Santos-Filho PC; Castro CG; Magalhaes D; Versluis A
J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1015-9. PubMed ID: 18634938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin.
Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth.
Sagsen B; Aslan B
Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):900-4. PubMed ID: 17014529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
Ausiello P; De Gee AJ; Rengo S; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of marginal ridge thickness on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated, composite restored maxillary premolars.
Shahrbaf S; Mirzakouchaki B; Oskoui SS; Kahnamoui MA
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 17555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite.
Hürmüzlü F; Kiremitçi A; Serper A; Altundaşar E; Siso SH
J Endod; 2003 Dec; 29(12):838-40. PubMed ID: 14686819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems.
Nothdurft FP; Seidel E; Gebhart F; Naumann M; Motter PJ; Pospiech PR
J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 18430506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with different filling techniques.
França FM; Worschech CC; Paulillo LA; Martins LR; Lovadino JR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Aug; 6(3):62-9. PubMed ID: 16127473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
Görücü J; Ozgünaltay G
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars.
Oskoee SS; Oskoee PA; Navimipour EJ; Shahi S
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 17910229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
el-Badrawy WA
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with fibre-reinforced composite restorations.
Geerts G; Pitout E; Visser H
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Mar; 19(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21528685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars.
Soares CJ; Roscoe MG; Castro CG; Santana FR; Raposo LH; Quagliatto PS; Novais VR
Int Endod J; 2011 Nov; 44(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 21740445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
