These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19249607)

  • 41. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
    Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Effect of composite restoration on the reinforcement of teeth].
    He Y; Zhao SL; Zhang XL; Liu HJ; Zhang XY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 May; 42(5):300-3. PubMed ID: 17686285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
    Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Resistance of cavity walls of composite filled teeth].
    Fabianelli A; De Luca S; Garberoglio R
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep; 59(13):94-100, 103-4. PubMed ID: 1824368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In vitro fracture resistance of glass-fiber and cast metal posts with different lengths.
    Giovani AR; Vansan LP; de Sousa Neto MD; Paulino SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 19231570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth.
    Daneshkazemi AR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Aug; 5(3):51-8. PubMed ID: 15318256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin.
    Khan SI; Anupama R; Deepalakshmi M; Kumar KS
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23534017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Finite Element Analysis of the Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Various Positions.
    Navimipour EJ; Firouzmandi M; Mirhashemi FS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 26067731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
    Kivanç BH; Görgül G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):33-40. PubMed ID: 18997914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of post type and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    McLaren JD; McLaren CI; Yaman P; Bin-Shuwaish MS; Dennison JD; McDonald NJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 19231569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Barbosa WF; Mondelli J; Franco EB; Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10388373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars Restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Different Positions.
    Jafari Navimipour E; Ebrahimi Chaharom ME; Alizadeh Oskoee P; Mohammadi N; Bahari M; Firouzmandi M
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 23277858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of different full-coverage crown systems on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with and without glass fiber posts.
    Salameh Z; Sorrentino R; Ounsi HF; Sadig W; Atiyeh F; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):842-6. PubMed ID: 18570992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of bonding amalgam on the reinforcement of teeth.
    Rasheed AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15623998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fracture behavior of structurally compromised non-vital maxillary premolars restored using experimental fiber reinforced composite crowns.
    Fokkinga WA; Kreulen CM; Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):326-32. PubMed ID: 17212072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the effect of different ferrule designs on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors incorporating fiber posts, composite cores and crown restorations.
    Dikbas I; Tanalp J; Ozel E; Koksal T; Ersoy M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):62-9. PubMed ID: 17994156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results.
    Mannocci F; Qualtrough AJ; Worthington HV; Watson TF; Pitt Ford TR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15765952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance.
    Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of several fibre-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth.
    Akman S; Akman M; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 21219366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.