197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19250129)
1. Toward a consensus on the QALY.
Drummond M; Brixner D; Gold M; Kind P; McGuire A; Nord E;
Value Health; 2009 Mar; 12 Suppl 1():S31-5. PubMed ID: 19250129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does it matter who you are or what you gain? An experimental study of preferences for resource allocation.
Schwappach DL
Health Econ; 2003 Apr; 12(4):255-67. PubMed ID: 12652513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In the land of blind decision making, is one-eyed economics the king?
Drummond M; Donaldson C
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2003; 2(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 14619276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality-adjusted life years.
Bravo Vergel Y; Sculpher M
Pract Neurol; 2008 Jun; 8(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 18502950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of quality-adjusted life-years in cost-effectiveness studies.
Sculpher M
Allergy; 2006 May; 61(5):527-30. PubMed ID: 16629779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Fair distribution and prioritization of health care].
Norup MS; Rossel P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2348-51. PubMed ID: 15281575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care.
Holm S
BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7164):1000-2. PubMed ID: 9841021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuing health for clinical and economic decisions: directions relevant for rheumatologists.
Harrison MJ; Bansback NJ; Marra CA; Drummond M; Tugwell PS; Boonen A
J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1770-5. PubMed ID: 21807800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Health services need knowledge of how the public values health].
Persson U; Hjelmgren J
Lakartidningen; 2003 Oct; 100(43):3436-7. PubMed ID: 14626774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [QALY--quality-adjusted life years--a controversial method for prioritization in health care].
Andréasson S; Calltorp J
Lakartidningen; 1992 Apr; 89(18):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1579026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Should prioritization in health care programs be based on duty or care ethics or benefit ethics?].
Føllesdal A
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Oct; 123(20):2897-8. PubMed ID: 14600720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life: the contested rhetoric of resource allocation and end-of-life decision making.
Nantais D; Kuczewski M
J Med Philos; 2004 Dec; 29(6):651-64. PubMed ID: 15590514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longevity bias in cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liu L; Rettenmaier AJ; Saving TR
Health Econ; 2008 Apr; 17(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 17990284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [How much does the society want to pay?].
Norheim OF
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Feb; 123(3):303. PubMed ID: 12640893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Health economics play more and more important role in health care prioritization. Better utilization of the meager health care resources is the goal].
Carlsson P; Anders A; Eliasson M
Lakartidningen; 2006 Nov 15-21; 103(46):3617-20, 3622-3. PubMed ID: 17153871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NICE discrimination.
Rawlins M; Dillon A
J Med Ethics; 2005 Dec; 31(12):683-4; discussion 685-8. PubMed ID: 16319226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Retaining, and enhancing, the QALY.
Lipscomb J; Drummond M; Fryback D; Gold M; Revicki D
Value Health; 2009 Mar; 12 Suppl 1():S18-26. PubMed ID: 19250127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Resource allocation in medical care.
Schwartz L
Med World News; 1976 Oct; 17(22):104. PubMed ID: 11663273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward solving the health care crisis: the paradoxical case for universal access to high technology.
Satz AB
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2008; 8(1):93-143. PubMed ID: 18564494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. QALYs: some challenges.
Nord E; Daniels N; Kamlet M
Value Health; 2009 Mar; 12 Suppl 1():S10-5. PubMed ID: 19250125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
