These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19251101)

  • 1. Analysis of interfraction prostate motion using megavoltage cone beam computed tomography by Bylund et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:949-956).
    Reddy N; Nori D; Lange C
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Mar; 73(4):1284; author reply 1284-5. PubMed ID: 19251101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of interfraction prostate motion using megavoltage cone beam computed tomography.
    Bylund KC; Bayouth JE; Smith MC; Hass AC; Bhatia SK; Buatti JM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):949-56. PubMed ID: 19014783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CTV margins in prostate cancer irradiation. In regard to Teh et al.: IMRT for prostate cancer: defining target volume based on correlated pathologic volume of disease (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;56:184-191).
    Macias V
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):320-1; author reply 321-2. PubMed ID: 15093933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 4D analysis of influence of patient movement and anatomy alteration on the quality of 3D U/S-based prostate HDR brachytherapy treatment delivery.
    Milickovic N; Mavroidis P; Tselis N; Nikolova I; Katsilieri Z; Kefala V; Zamboglou N; Baltas D
    Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):4982-93. PubMed ID: 21978042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate postbrachytherapy seed distribution: comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced, T1- and T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography: initial experience: in regard to BLOCH et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:70-78).
    Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1289; author reply 1289-90. PubMed ID: 18572093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does image-guided radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) improve toxicity profile in whole pelvic-treated high-risk prostate cancer? Comparison between IG-IMRT and IMRT: In regard to Chung et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008. In press).
    Jothybasu KS; Bahl A; Subramani V; Sharma DN; Rath GK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(4):1273; author reply 1273. PubMed ID: 18954726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of different urethrogram protocols can influence the definition of planning target volume inferior margin in prostate cancer radiotherapy. In regard to Liu et al.: prostate movement during simulation resulting from retrograde urethrogram compared with "natural" prostate movement (INT J RADIAT ONCOL BIOL PHYS 2004;60:470-475).
    Russi EG; Taglianti RV; Airaldi C
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1278; author reply 1278-9. PubMed ID: 15752914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The need and prospect of individualized external beam radiotherapy dose escalation beyond 80 gy to treat prostate cancer: in regard to Eade et al. (Int J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007;68:682-689).
    Cheung MR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):645; author reply 645-6. PubMed ID: 18207039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cone beam CT-Based Study for Clinical Target Definition Using Pelvic Anatomy During Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy.
    Showalter TN; Nawaz AO; Xiao Y; Galvin JM; Valicenti RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 17869021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In regard to Litzenberg et al.: Retrospective analysis of prostate patients with implanted gold markers using off-line and adaptive therapy protocols (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:123-133).
    Yan D; Lockman D; Lebesque JV
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Apr; 64(5):1613-4; author reply 1614-5. PubMed ID: 16580514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Qualitative estimation of pelvic organ interactions and their consequences on prostate motion: study on a deceased person.
    Keros L; Bernier V; Aletti P; Marchesi V; Wolf D; Noel A
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 16872097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In regards to Thames et al.: increasing external beam dose for T1-T2 prostate cancer: effect on risk groups. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:975-981).
    Pickles T; Williams SG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jan; 67(1):318-9; author reply 319. PubMed ID: 17189080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In regard to Lee et al.: "Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy" (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:52-59).
    Shanahan TG; Mueller PW; Maxey RB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep; 63(1):311-2; author reply 312. PubMed ID: 16111606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prostate localization systems for prostate radiotherapy].
    de Crevoisier R; Lagrange JL; Messai T; M'Barek B; Lefkopoulos D
    Cancer Radiother; 2006 Nov; 10(6-7):394-401. PubMed ID: 17035061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In regard to Fiorino et al.: Rectal dose-volume constraints in high-dose radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57:953-962).
    Bauman G; Rodrigues G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):912-4; author reply 914-5. PubMed ID: 15183497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of multiorgan finite element-based prostate deformation model enabling registration of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning.
    Hensel JM; Ménard C; Chung PW; Milosevic MF; Kirilova A; Moseley JL; Haider MA; Brock KK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1522-8. PubMed ID: 17674983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In regard to Kupelian et al.: Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or =72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seed/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:25-33).
    Halperin RM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Feb; 61(2):631-2; author reply 632. PubMed ID: 15667989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy: Are there gaps, holes, and islands in the argument? In regard to Wallner et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57:1297-1303).
    Rubenstein J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):305; author reply 305-6. PubMed ID: 15629630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comment on dose escalation and biochemical failure in prostate cancer: in regard to Kuban et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70:67-74).
    Schulz RJ; Kagan AR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1288; author reply 1288-9. PubMed ID: 18572089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary on dose escalation and biochemical failure in prostate cancer: in regard to Eade et al. (Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007;68:682-689).
    Schulz RJ; Kagan AR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):645; author reply 645-6. PubMed ID: 18207038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.