BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1925168)

  • 1. Detection of outlying data in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies.
    Liu JP; Weng CS
    Stat Med; 1991 Sep; 10(9):1375-89. PubMed ID: 1925168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining outlying subjects and outlying records in bioequivalence trials.
    Wang W; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 12635902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outlier detection in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies.
    Chow SC; Tse SK
    Stat Med; 1990 May; 9(5):549-58. PubMed ID: 2135947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of outlying subjects on decision of bioequivalence.
    Ki FY; Liu JP; Wang W; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1995 Mar; 5(1):71-94. PubMed ID: 7613561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On population and individual bioequivalence.
    Schall R; Luus HG
    Stat Med; 1993 Jun; 12(12):1109-24. PubMed ID: 8210816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Different Sampling Schedules on Results of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies: Evaluation by Means of Monte Carlo Simulations.
    Kano EK; Chiann C; Fukuda K; Porta V
    Drug Res (Stuttg); 2017 Aug; 67(8):451-457. PubMed ID: 28561232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing treatment variances in repeated measures bioavailability trials.
    Jiang G; Sarkar SK
    Stat Med; 1999 May; 18(9):1133-49. PubMed ID: 10378261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Truncated area under the curve as a measure of relative extent of bioavailability: evaluation using experimental data and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Gaudreault J; Potvin D; Lavigne J; Lalonde RL
    Pharm Res; 1998 Oct; 15(10):1621-9. PubMed ID: 9794507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of individual and population bioequivalence using the probability that bioavailabilities are similar.
    Schall R
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):615-26. PubMed ID: 7662849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outlying Observation Diagnostics in Growth Curve Modeling.
    Tong X; Zhang Z
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(6):768-788. PubMed ID: 29161189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the repeated cross-over designs in assessing bioequivalence.
    Liu JP
    Stat Med; 1995 May 15-30; 14(9-10):1067-78; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 7569501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are the current bioequivalence standards sufficient for the acceptance of narrow therapeutic index drugs? Utilization of a computer simulated warfarin bioequivalence model.
    Walker SE; Friesen MH
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 1999; 2(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10951658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust and bootstrap testing procedures for bioequivalence.
    Shen CF; Iglewicz B
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):65-90. PubMed ID: 8019585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of direct formulation effect under log-normal distribution in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies.
    Liu JP; Weng CS
    Stat Med; 1992 May; 11(7):881-96. PubMed ID: 1604068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New bioequivalence studies: individual bioequivalence and population bioequivalence.
    Nakai K; Fujita M; Ogata H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2000 Nov; 120(11):1201-8. PubMed ID: 11190205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of 2 formulations of valsartan 160-mg tablets: A randomized, single-dose, 2-period crossover study in healthy Korean male volunteers.
    Kim JE; Ki MH; Yoon IS; Cho HJ; Kim RS; Tae Kim G; Kim DD
    Clin Ther; 2014 Feb; 36(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 24529292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New approach to assess bioequivalence parameters using generalized gamma mixed-effect model (model-based asymptotic bioequivalence test).
    Chen YI; Huang CS
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(5):786-97. PubMed ID: 24105871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioequivalence and intrasubject variability.
    Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1991; 1(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 1844697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of four different methods for outlier detection in bioequivalence studies.
    Ramsay T; Elkum N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 15702604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fieller's confidence intervals for the ratio of two means in the assessment of average bioequivalence from crossover data.
    Vuorinen J; Tuominen J
    Stat Med; 1994 Dec 15-30; 13(23-24):2531-45. PubMed ID: 7701152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.