These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19251832)
1. Considerations for ethics in multisite research in paediatric palliative care. Cadell S; Ho G; Jacques L; Wilson K; Davies B; Steele R Palliat Med; 2009 Apr; 23(3):274-5. PubMed ID: 19251832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Canadian research ethics boards and multisite research: experiences from two minimal-risk studies. Racine E; Bell E; Deslauriers C IRB; 2010; 32(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 20590052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way? Gold JL; Dewa CS Health Serv Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):291-307. PubMed ID: 15663714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advances in multicentre ethics review. Irvine R Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):297-8; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicentre drug trials, ethics approval and death of patients. Millar JA Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):298-9; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics committee approval of multicentre studies. MacDonald A Intern Med J; 2005 May; 35(5):311-2; author reply 312. PubMed ID: 15845120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Viewpoint: are the research ethics committees working in the best interests of participants in an increasingly globalized research environment? Chalmers D J Intern Med; 2011 Apr; 269(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 21410787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Office for Human Research Protections and the NIH. Beck RW N Engl J Med; 2003 Nov; 349(21):2076-7. PubMed ID: 14627798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [How to face the ethical challenges of multicentric clinical investigation?]. MartÃnez SM Medicina (B Aires); 2008; 68(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 18786895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The ethics approval process for multisite research studies in Australia: changes sought by the Australian Genomics initiative. Haas MA; Boughtwood TF; Quinn MC; Med J Aust; 2019 Nov; 211(10):440-444.e1. PubMed ID: 31734945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary: Can we facilitate the ethical approval of international observational studies? Cuttini M; Saracci R Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 38(4):1108-9. PubMed ID: 19584126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards. Abernethy AP; Capell WH; Aziz NM; Ritchie C; Prince-Paul M; Bennett RE; Kutner JS J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Dec; 48(6):1211-21. PubMed ID: 24879998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can multiple IRBs spoil the broth? Goldman EB Ann Neurol; 2010 Feb; 67(2):149-50. PubMed ID: 20225267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical decision making in committee. A view from Germany. Sass HM Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):65-81. PubMed ID: 15282922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Central IRBs: why are some institutions reluctant to sign on? McNeil C J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(13):953-5. PubMed ID: 15998943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Multisite research: a spirit of cooperation. Schmelzer M; Daniels G; Dudley-Brown S; Foote K; Hayes A; Nardelli N Gastroenterol Nurs; 2011; 34(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 21814068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy. Klitzman R; Pivovarova E; Lidz CW JAMA; 2017 May; 317(20):2061-2062. PubMed ID: 28445582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Local research ethics committees. Oxford committee was concerned that trial might be unethical. Talbot D; Reynolds DJ BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7120):1464. PubMed ID: 9418109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]