188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19251956)
1. Short- and long-term effects of a training session on pathologists' performance: the INQAT experience for histological grading in breast cancer.
Paradiso A; Ellis IO; Zito FA; Marubini E; Pizzamiglio S; Verderio P
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 19251956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality control for histological grading in breast cancer: an Italian experience.
Italian Network for Quality Assurance of Tumour Biomarkers (INQAT) Group
Pathologica; 2005 Feb; 97(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15918409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement.
Dalton LW; Pinder SE; Elston CE; Ellis IO; Page DL; Dupont WD; Blamey RW
Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 10912931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nodal stage classification for breast carcinoma: improving interobserver reproducibility through standardized histologic criteria and image-based training.
Turner RR; Weaver DL; Cserni G; Lester SC; Hirsch K; Elashoff DA; Fitzgibbons PL; Viale G; Mazzarol G; Ibarra JA; Schnitt SJ; Giuliano AE
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 18182666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathologists' assistants practice: a measurement of performance.
Galvis CO; Raab SS; D'Amico F; Grzybicki DM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Dec; 116(6):816-22. PubMed ID: 11764069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.
Sikka M; Agarwal S; Bhatia A
Indian J Cancer; 1999; 36(2-4):149-53. PubMed ID: 10921219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assessment program in histopathology: a pilot study from Maharashtra.
Agashe S; Gosavi A; Jagdale R; Pol J
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2002 Jul; 45(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 12785166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Raising the bar: a plea for standardization and quality improvement in the practice of breast pathology.
Masood S
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 16958956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of an increase in grading categories and double reporting on the reliability of breast cancer grade.
Chowdhury N; Pai MR; Lobo FD; Kini H; Varghese R
APMIS; 2007 Apr; 115(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 17504304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Training and standardized criteria improve the diagnosis of premalignant breast lesions].
Salles Mde A; Gouvêa AP; Savi D; Figueiredo MA; Tavares Neto R; Paula RA; Gobbi H
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2008 Nov; 30(11):550-5. PubMed ID: 19148432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Problems in improving the training, advanced education and certification of clinical pathologists].
Smol'iannikov AV; Khmel''nitskiĭ OK; Avtandilov GG
Arkh Patol; 1986; 48(8):3-7. PubMed ID: 3778232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histologic grading of invasive lobular carcinoma: does use of a 2-tiered nuclear grading system improve interobserver variability?
Adams AL; Chhieng DC; Bell WC; Winokur T; Hameed O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Aug; 13(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 19608079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reproducibility of nuclear grade in breast neoplasm. A multicenter experience].
Sundblad AS; Alonso E; Casas JG; Diaz L; Diaz MC; De Elizalde S; Frahm I; Monti J; Muñiz Saavedra V; Ricci L; Vighi S; Zoppi J
Medicina (B Aires); 1996; 56(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 8734928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reproducibility of histoprognostic grades of invasive breast cancer].
Jacquemier J; Charpin C
Ann Pathol; 1998 Nov; 18(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 9864574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer variation in histological grading of breast cancer.
Hopton DS; Thorogood J; Clayden AD; MacKinnon D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1989 Feb; 15(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 2645174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Challenges for pathologists in clinical laboratory medicine].
Tezuka F
Rinsho Byori; 2001 Jun; 49(6):593-5. PubMed ID: 11452548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Experience in teaching microscopic diagnosis to beginning pathologists].
Povzun SA
Arkh Patol; 2005; 67(5):60-2. PubMed ID: 16323486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dysplasia classification: pathology in disgrace?
Bosman FT
J Pathol; 2001 Jun; 194(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 11400140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and preliminary evaluation of the VPS ReplaySuite: a virtual double-headed microscope for pathology.
Johnston DJ; Costello SP; Dervan PA; O'Shea DG
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2005 Apr; 5():10. PubMed ID: 15845147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human performance studies of the video microscopy component of a dynamic telepathology system.
Weinstein RS; Bloom KJ; Krupinski EA; Rozek LS
Zentralbl Pathol; 1992 Dec; 138(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 1297431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
