These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19252568)

  • 1. Explicit description of polarization coupling in lidar applications.
    Hayman M; Thayer JP
    Opt Lett; 2009 Mar; 34(5):611-3. PubMed ID: 19252568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction technology of a polarization lidar with a complex optical system.
    Di H; Hua H; Cui Y; Hua D; Li B; Song Y
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2016 Aug; 33(8):1488-94. PubMed ID: 27505646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reexamination of depolarization in lidar measurements.
    Gimmestad GG
    Appl Opt; 2008 Jul; 47(21):3795-802. PubMed ID: 18641748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General description of polarization in lidar using Stokes vectors and polar decomposition of Mueller matrices.
    Hayman M; Thayer JP
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Apr; 29(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 22472814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of an all-day portable polarization lidar system based on the division-of-focal-plane scheme for atmospheric polarization measurements.
    Kong Z; Ma T; Zheng K; Cheng Y; Gong Z; Hua D; Mei L
    Opt Express; 2021 Nov; 29(23):38512-38526. PubMed ID: 34808903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polarization Lidar: Correction of instrumental effects.
    Biele J; Beyerle G; Baumgarten G
    Opt Express; 2000 Dec; 7(12):427-35. PubMed ID: 19407894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polarization-discrimination technique to maximize the lidar signal-to-noise ratio for daylight operations.
    Hassebo YY; Gross B; Oo M; Moshary F; Ahmed S
    Appl Opt; 2006 Aug; 45(22):5521-31. PubMed ID: 16855650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Airborne polarized lidar detection of scattering layers in the ocean.
    Vasilkov AP; Goldin YA; Gureev BA; Hoge FE; Swift RN; Wright CW
    Appl Opt; 2001 Aug; 40(24):4353-64. PubMed ID: 18360476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic error of lidar profiles caused by a polarization-dependent receiver transmission: quantification and error correction scheme.
    Mattis I; Tesche M; Grein M; Freudenthaler V; Müller D
    Appl Opt; 2009 May; 48(14):2742-51. PubMed ID: 19424398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved calibration method for depolarization lidar measurement.
    Liu B; Wang Z
    Opt Express; 2013 Jun; 21(12):14583-90. PubMed ID: 23787646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-signal method for accurate measurements of depolarization ratio with lidar.
    Reichardt J; Baumgart R; McGee TJ
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4909-13. PubMed ID: 12952338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polarization-independent optical circulator for high accuracy Faraday depolarization lidar.
    Shiina T; Noguchi K; Fukuchi T
    Appl Opt; 2012 Mar; 51(7):898-904. PubMed ID: 22410893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of an atmospheric polarization Scheimpflug lidar system based on a time-division multiplexing scheme.
    Mei L; Guan P
    Opt Lett; 2017 Sep; 42(18):3562-3565. PubMed ID: 28914902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial distribution of doubly scattered polarized laser radiation in the focal plane of a lidar receiver.
    Griaznov V; Veselovskii I; Di Girolamo P; Korenskii M; Summa D
    Appl Opt; 2007 Sep; 46(27):6821-30. PubMed ID: 17882305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the relationships between lidar integrated backscattered light and accumulated depolarization ratios for linear and circular polarization for water droplets, fog oil, and dust.
    Cao X; Roy G; Roy N; Bernier R
    Appl Opt; 2009 Jul; 48(21):4130-41. PubMed ID: 19623227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Four-component polarization measurement of lidar atmospheric scattering.
    Houston JD; Carswell AI
    Appl Opt; 1978 Feb; 17(4):614-20. PubMed ID: 20197836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depolarization ratio measurement using single photomultiplier tube in micropulse lidar.
    Dubey PK; Jain SL; Arya BC; Kulkarni PS
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 May; 80(5):053111. PubMed ID: 19485496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lidar for multiple backscattering and depolarization observations.
    Allen RJ; Platt CM
    Appl Opt; 1977 Dec; 16(12):3193-9. PubMed ID: 20174327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of various linear depolarization parameters measured by lidar.
    Cairo F; Di Donfrancesco G; Adriani A; Pulvirenti L; Fierli F
    Appl Opt; 1999 Jul; 38(21):4425-32. PubMed ID: 18323927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method for reconstructing atmospheric optical parameters from the data of polarization lidar sensing.
    Samoilova SV; Balin YS; Krekova MM; Winker DM
    Appl Opt; 2005 Jun; 44(17):3499-509. PubMed ID: 16007848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.