197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19253031)
1. "Other selves": moral and legal proposals regarding the personhood of cryopreserved human embryos.
Brugger EC
Theor Med Bioeth; 2009; 30(2):105-29. PubMed ID: 19253031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Embryos, individuals, and persons: an argument against embryo creation and research.
Tollefsen C
J Appl Philos; 2001; 18(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 14582501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The moral status of the human embryo according to Peter Singer: individuality, humanity, and personhood.
Howard J
Linacre Q; 2005 Aug; 72(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 16317845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The moral status of the human embryo: the twinning argument.
Brogaard B
Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 16208838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Potentiality and human embryos.
Lizza JP
Bioethics; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-85. PubMed ID: 17845464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Persons, practices, and the conception argument.
Werpehowski W
J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 9360199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants.
Strong C
J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):457-78. PubMed ID: 9360198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
Bowens KK
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral uncertainty in bioethical argumentation: a new understanding of the pro-life view on early human embryos.
Żuradzki T
Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 35(6):441-57. PubMed ID: 25230689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Of embryos and empire.
Cohen E
New Atlantis; 2003; (2):3-16. PubMed ID: 15584196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research on human embryos--a justification.
Brown J
J Med Ethics; 1986 Dec; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 3806632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument.
Devolder K
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):533-6. PubMed ID: 23139393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why current UK legislation on embryo research is immoral. How the argument from lack of qualities and the argument from potentiality have been applied and why they should be rejected.
Deckers J
Bioethics; 2005 Jun; 19(3):251-71. PubMed ID: 16167404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Double-effect reasoning and the conception of human embryos.
Murphy TF
J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):529-32. PubMed ID: 22902385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twinning, identity, and moral status.
Napier S
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 23311844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The argument from potentiality in the embryo protection debate: finally "depotentialized"?
Stier M; Schoene-Seifert B
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23311835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Humanity, personhood and abortion.
Ray AC
Int Philos Q; 1985 Sep; 25(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 11655863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When potential does not matter: what developments in cellular biology tell us about the concept of legal personhood.
Will J; Adashi EY; Cohen IG
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 23311842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Embryos, the principle of proportionality, and the shaky ground of moral respect.
Pugh J
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):420-6. PubMed ID: 23445499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
