These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19253092)

  • 1. Processing fluency as a predictor of salience asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test.
    Chang BP; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2030-54. PubMed ID: 19253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discriminating between the effects of valence and salience in the Implicit Association Test.
    Chang BP; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2251-75. PubMed ID: 21722058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the implicit association test: comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004).
    Greenwald AG; Nosek BA; Banaji MR; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):420-5; author reply 426-30. PubMed ID: 16131272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the alcohol-IAT.
    Houben K; Wiers RW
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 17176661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations.
    Rothermund K; Wentura D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Jun; 133(2):139-65. PubMed ID: 15149248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When old and frail is not the same: dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods.
    Gast A; Rothermund K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):479-98. PubMed ID: 19606404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
    Lamy D; Zoaris L
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the category effect: the influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search.
    Smilek D; Dixon MJ; Merikle PM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 16510131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF).
    Rothermund K; Teige-Mocigemba S; Gast A; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 18609400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms of the associated nontargets effect: processes influenced by statistical learning in a simple visual environment.
    Reynolds A; Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):837-59. PubMed ID: 17514597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Process components of the Implicit Association Test: a diffusion-model analysis.
    Klauer KC; Voss A; Schmitz F; Teige-Mocigemba S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 17723053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetries in visual-spatial processing following childhood stroke.
    Schatz J; Craft S; Koby M; DeBaun MR
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 15099156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Base rate effects on the IAT.
    Bluemke M; Fiedler K
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):1029-38. PubMed ID: 19700351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: why flexible people have small IAT effects.
    Klauer KC; Schmitz F; Teige-Mocigemba S; Voss A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):595-619. PubMed ID: 19672797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Kinoshita S; Peek-O'Leary M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2102-20. PubMed ID: 17095490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of training and transfer on global/local processing.
    Dulaney CL; Marks W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 16914108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):94-106. PubMed ID: 11392986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: new evidence for a task-set switching account of the implicit association test effect.
    Klauer KC; Mierke J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Feb; 31(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 15619593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.