These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19253152)

  • 1. Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC).
    Schubert S; Schnabel KP; Winkelmann A
    Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e13-7. PubMed ID: 19253152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by multiple choice and short essay questions.
    Oyebola DD; Adewoye OE; Iyaniwura JO; Alada AR; Fasanmade AA; Raji Y
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2000; 29(3-4):201-5. PubMed ID: 11713989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum.
    Bierer SB; Dannefer EF; Taylor C; Hall P; Hull AL
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(7):e171-7. PubMed ID: 18777415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations.
    Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V
    Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a 3D-MC examination format in anatomy.
    Steinborn A; Werner S; März M; Brunk I
    Ann Anat; 2021 Jul; 236():151666. PubMed ID: 33667594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of student performance in multiple-choice and long essay questions in the MBBS stage I physiology examination at the University of the West Indies (Mona Campus).
    Pepple DJ; Young LE; Carroll RG
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Jun; 34(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 20522902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Transposition of an American-designed comprehensive medical student examination within the framework of the forthcoming French nationwide comprehensive examination. A preliminary study].
    Fournier JP; De Champlain AF; Benchimol D; Staccini P; Subhiyah R; Braun M; Kohler C; Guidet B; Claudepierre P; Prevel M; Scoles P; Holtzman K; Swanson D; Angelucci K; McGrenra C; Goldberg J; Rampal P; Melnick D
    Ann Med Interne (Paris); 2003 May; 154(3):148-56. PubMed ID: 12910041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of traditional methods with 3D computer models in the instruction of hepatobiliary anatomy.
    Keedy AW; Durack JC; Sandhu P; Chen EM; O'Sullivan PS; Breiman RS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 21412990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students' academic performance in applied clinical anatomy.
    Shiozawa T; Butz B; Herlan S; Kramer A; Hirt B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27273871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The anatomy competence score: a new marker for anatomical ability.
    Schoeman S; Chandratilake M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 22127894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The criteria and analysis of good multiple choice questions in a health professional setting.
    Abdel-Hameed AA; Al-Faris EA; Alorainy IA; Al-Rukban MO
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Oct; 26(10):1505-10. PubMed ID: 16228046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing anatomy: Dissecting spatial and non-spatial knowledge in multiple-choice question assessment.
    Dickson J; Shaw DJ; Gardiner A; Rhind S
    Anat Sci Educ; 2024; 17(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 37529887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
    Hisley KC; Anderson LD; Smith SE; Kavic SM; Tracy JK
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Structure of text and multiple-choice questions in continuing medical education (CME) in two specialist journals].
    Nobbe H; Lösche P; Griebenow R
    Med Klin (Munich); 2008 Jan; 103(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 18219458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Progress testing with short answer questions.
    Rademakers J; Ten Cate TJ; Bär PR
    Med Teach; 2005 Nov; 27(7):578-82. PubMed ID: 16332547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods.
    Auewarakul C; Downing SM; Jaturatamrong U; Praditsuwan R
    Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 39(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 15733163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advanced 3D visualization in student-centred medical education.
    Silén C; Wirell S; Kvist J; Nylander E; Smedby O
    Med Teach; 2008 Jun; 30(5):e115-24. PubMed ID: 18576181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.