118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19253236)
1. Comparison of glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression analysis to discriminate glaucomatous and healthy eyes.
Takmaz T; Can I
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 19253236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.
Zangwill LM; Jain S; Racette L; Ernstrom KB; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2653-60. PubMed ID: 17525196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes.
De León-Ortega JE; Sakata LM; Monheit BE; McGwin G; Arthur SN; Girkin CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 144(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 17693382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.
Coops A; Henson DB; Kwartz AJ; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5348-55. PubMed ID: 17122123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening for glaucoma with Moorfields regression analysis and glaucoma probability score in confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Kamdeu Fansi AA; Agoumi Y; Harasymowycz PJ
Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 46(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 21784211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of the Moorfields Regression Analysis using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in glaucoma patients with visual field defects.
Medved N; Cvenkel B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 17415695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph.
Miglior S; Guareschi M; Albe' E; Gomarasca S; Vavassori M; Orzalesi N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 12834666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity and specificity with the glaucoma probability score in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II in Japanese eyes.
Saito H; Tomidokoro A; Yanagisawa M; Iwase A; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2009 Mar; 18(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 19295378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confocal Laser Scanning Tomography to Predict Visual Field Conversion in Patients With Ocular Hypertension and Early Glaucoma.
Schrems-Hoesl LM; Schrems WA; Laemmer R; Horn FK; Juenemann AG; Kruse FE; Mardin CY
J Glaucoma; 2016 Apr; 25(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 25304282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II) in high-risk populations: a pilot study.
Harasymowycz PJ; Papamatheakis DG; Fansi AK; Gresset J; Lesk MR
Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2164-71. PubMed ID: 16325710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-3 glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression analysis of optic nerve head in glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.
Caglar Ç; Gul A; Batur M; Yasar T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 255(1):153-161. PubMed ID: 27743158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optic disc classification by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and by physicians with varying experience of glaucoma.
Andersson S; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
Eye (Lond); 2011 Nov; 25(11):1401-7. PubMed ID: 21836629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the diagnostic capability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomographs 2 and 3 for glaucoma in the Indian population.
Rao HL; Babu GJ; Sekhar GC
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 19969365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the onset of glaucoma: the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to theOcular Hypertension Treatment Study.
Weinreb RN; Zangwill LM; Jain S; Becerra LM; Dirkes K; Piltz-Seymour JR; Cioffi GA; Trick GL; Coleman AL; Brandt JD; Liebmann JM; Gordon MO; Kass MA;
Ophthalmology; 2010 Sep; 117(9):1674-83. PubMed ID: 20633931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of subjects with a moderate cup to disc ratio using optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph 3: impact of the disc area.
Ulas F; Dogan Ü; Kaymaz A; Çelik F; Çelebi S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 63(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 25686054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Pajarín AB; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pueyo V
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):354-359. PubMed ID: 18078851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
