These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19253907)
1. Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate? Renkawitz T; Schuster T; Herold T; Goessmann H; Sendtner E; Grifka J; Kalteis T Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 19253907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision of Limb Length Measurement in Imageless Navigation THA with Modified Registration Technique in Semilateral Decubitus Position. Suksathien Y; Sueajui J J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Jan; 100(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 29911743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative validation of navigated limb measurements in THA using a pinless femoral array. Ulivi M; Orlandini L; Pascale W; Consonni O; Sansone V J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1026-9. PubMed ID: 24210668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femoral pinless length and offset measurements during computer-assisted, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Renkawitz T; Sendtner E; Schuster T; Weber M; Grifka J; Woerner M J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1021-5. PubMed ID: 24269098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leg length and offset measures with a pinless femoral reference array during THA. Renkawitz T; Schuster T; Grifka J; Kalteis T; Sendtner E Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Jul; 468(7):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19768517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of imageless stem navigation during simulated total hip arthroplasty. Renkawitz T; Sendtner E; Grifka J; Kalteis T Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):785-8. PubMed ID: 19085495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproduction of Hip Offset and Leg Length in Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Accurate Are We? Ellapparadja P; Mahajan V; Deakin AH; Deep K J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1002-7. PubMed ID: 25677938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vitro investigation of a noninvasive referencing technology for computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Renkawitz T; Gneiting S; Schaumburger J; Woerner M; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Schuster T; Sendtner E Orthopedics; 2010 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 20415298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluoroscopy and imageless navigation enable an equivalent reconstruction of leg length and global and femoral offset in THA. Weber M; Woerner M; Springorum R; Sendtner E; Hapfelmeier A; Grifka J; Renkawitz T Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 472(10):3150-8. PubMed ID: 24964886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjustment of leg length using imageless navigation THA software without a femoral tracker. Nishio S; Fukunishi S; Fukui T; Fujihara Y; Yoshiya S J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 21394632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Leg length and offset differences above 5mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics. Renkawitz T; Weber T; Dullien S; Woerner M; Dendorfer S; Grifka J; Weber M Gait Posture; 2016 Sep; 49():196-201. PubMed ID: 27450670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Cadaver Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of a New 3D Mini-Optical Navigation Tool for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Vigdorchik JM; Cross MB; Bogner EA; Miller TT; Muir JM; Schwarzkopf R Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():447-454. PubMed ID: 28537348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? Kalteis T; Handel M; Bäthis H; Perlick L; Tingart M; Grifka J J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Feb; 88(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 16434517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of limb-length discrepancy after THA: with and without computer navigation. Licini DJ; Burnikel DJ; Meneghini RM; Ochsner JL Orthopedics; 2013 May; 36(5):e543-7. PubMed ID: 23672903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component. Stiehl JB; Heck DA; Jaramaz B; Amiot LP Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 17487661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reduced variability in cup positioning: the direct anterior surgical approach using navigation. Nogler M; Mayr E; Krismer M; Thaler M Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):789-93. PubMed ID: 19085496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a new leg length measurement algorithm in hip arthroplasty. Murphy SB; Ecker TM Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():85-9. PubMed ID: 17572632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Pasquier G; Ducharne G; Ali ES; Giraud F; Mouttet A; Durante E Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 96(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 20471935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery. Renkawitz T; Tingart M; Grifka J; Sendtner E; Kalteis T Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 Sep; 6(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 19751123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]