These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19254080)

  • 1. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events.
    Oskarsson AT; Van Boven L; McClelland GH; Hastie R
    Psychol Bull; 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85. PubMed ID: 19254080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On producing random binary sequences.
    Nickerson RS; Butler SF
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 19507422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The intentional mind and the hot hand: Perceiving intentions makes streaks seem likely to continue.
    Caruso EM; Waytz A; Epley N
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 20472229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler's Fallacy Reasoning.
    Rao K; Hastie R
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13211. PubMed ID: 36680427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relatively random: context effects on perceived randomness and predicted outcomes.
    Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1642-8. PubMed ID: 23356242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness?
    Ayton P; Fischer I
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1369-78. PubMed ID: 15900930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four.
    Hahn U; Warren PA
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Apr; 116(2):454-61. PubMed ID: 19348550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occurrence and nonoccurrence of random sequences: comment on Hahn and Warren (2009).
    Sun Y; Tweney RD; Wang H
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):697-705; discussion 706-11. PubMed ID: 20438245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An effect of inter-trial duration on the gambler's fallacy choice bias.
    Militana E; Wolfson E; Cleaveland JM
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):455-9. PubMed ID: 20176090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Base rates, contingencies, and prediction behavior.
    Kareev Y; Fiedler K; Avrahami J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19271852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomness and inductions from streaks: "gambler's fallacy" versus "hot hand".
    Burns BD; Corpus B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):179-84. PubMed ID: 15117006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Who "believes" in the Gambler's Fallacy and why?
    Farmer GD; Warren PA; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 28054813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Another look at why people are reluctant to exchange lottery tickets.
    Risen JL; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jul; 93(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 17605585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of aperiodic target sequences by saccades.
    Shikauchi M; Ishii S; Shibata T
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 189(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 18359103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivated reasoning in the prediction of sports outcomes and the belief in the "hot hand".
    Braga JPN; Mata A; Ferreira MB; Sherman SJ
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Dec; 31(8):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 27796170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Losses and External Outcomes Interact to Produce the Gambler's Fallacy.
    Mossbridge JA; Roney CJ; Suzuki S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170057. PubMed ID: 28125684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The hazards of underspecified models: the case of symmetry in everyday predictions.
    Sedlmeier P; Kilinç B
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):770-80. PubMed ID: 15250783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judgments of cause and blame: the effects of intentionality and foreseeability.
    Lagnado DA; Channon S
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):754-70. PubMed ID: 18706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.
    Juslin P; Winman A; Hansson P
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):678-703. PubMed ID: 17638502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.