156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19254595)
1. Provider documentation and elective induction of labor: a 6-month experience at a university medical center.
Holm LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):336.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19254595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Indications for labor induction. Differences between university and community hospitals.
Beebe LA; Rayburn WF; Beaty CM; Eberly KL; Stanley JR; Rayburn LA
J Reprod Med; 2000 Jun; 45(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 10900580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.
Laye MR; Dellinger EH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. PubMed ID: 16777051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital.
Reisner DP; Wallin TK; Zingheim RW; Luthy DA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 200(6):674.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19376493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Induction of labor in the absence of standard medical indications: incidence and correlates.
Lydon-Rochelle MT; Cárdenas V; Nelson JC; Holt VL; Gardella C; Easterling TR
Med Care; 2007 Jun; 45(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 17515777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery.
Le Ray C; Carayol M; Bréart G; Goffinet F;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 17520395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of induced deliveries in growth-restricted fetuses: second thoughts about the vaginal option.
Maslovitz S; Shenhav M; Levin I; Almog B; Ochshorn Y; Kupferminc M; Many A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Feb; 279(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 18506461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data.
Bailit JL;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):269.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20816150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes.
Alanis MC; Robinson CJ; Hulsey TC; Ebeling M; Johnson DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):262.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18771976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardizing criteria for scheduling elective labor inductions.
Durham L; Veltman L; Davis P; Ferguson L; Hacker M; Hooker D; Larison K; Pribyl J; Twilleager K; Van Hout G
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2008; 33(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 18453906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient education to reduce elective labor inductions.
Simpson KR; Newman G; Chirino OR
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2010; 35(4):188-94; quiz 195-6. PubMed ID: 20585206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery.
Clark SL; Miller DD; Belfort MA; Dildy GA; Frye DK; Meyers JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 200(2):156.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19110225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36(0/7)-38(6/7) weeks' gestation.
Donovan EF; Lannon C; Bailit J; Rose B; Iams JD; Byczkowski T;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 202(3):243.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20207241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Labor induction process improvement: a patient quality-of-care initiative.
Fisch JM; English D; Pedaline S; Brooks K; Simhan HN
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 113(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 19305322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective induction: When? Ever?
Grobman WA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 50(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 17513939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in compliance with documentation using computerized obstetric records.
Haberman S; Rotas M; Perlman K; Feldman JG
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 17601909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989-1998.
Zhang J; Yancey MK; Henderson CE
J Reprod Med; 2002 Feb; 47(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 11883350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late pregnancy complications can affect risk estimates of elective induction of labor.
Hernandez GD; Korst LM; Goodwin TM; Miller DA; Caughey AB; Ouzounian JG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Jun; 24(6):787-94. PubMed ID: 21121871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic fetal monitoring. Are we meeting documentation standards?
Hankins GD; Leicht T; Anderson GD; Rowe TF
J Reprod Med; 1999 May; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 10360257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction rates and delivery outcomes after a policy limiting elective inductions.
Yamasato K; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
Matern Child Health J; 2015 May; 19(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 25272996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
