BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1925514)

  • 1. Port-A-Cath: a study of complication rates.
    Robinson MO; Halverson P
    S D J Med; 1991 Jul; 44(7):187-90. PubMed ID: 1925514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
    Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term central venous catheters: issues for care.
    Wickham R; Purl S; Welker D
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 1992 May; 8(2):133-47. PubMed ID: 1621004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mechanisms of failure of totally implantable central venous access system: analysis of 73 cases with fracture of catheter.
    Lin CH; Wu HS; Chan DC; Hsieh CB; Huang MH; Yu JC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 36(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 19709847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications of an implantable venous access device (Port-a-Cath) during intermittent continuous infusion of chemotherapy.
    Poorter RL; Lauw FN; Bemelman WA; Bakker PJ; Taat CW; Veenhof CH
    Eur J Cancer; 1996 Dec; 32A(13):2262-6. PubMed ID: 9038608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Venous access ports: frequency and management of complications in oncology patients.
    Jordan K; Behlendorf T; Surov A; Kegel T; Maher G; Wolf HH
    Onkologie; 2008 Jul; 31(7):404-10. PubMed ID: 18596390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Future dimensions in vascular access--peripheral implantable ports.
    McKee J
    J Intraven Nurs; 1991; 14(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 1748920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgically implanted subcutaneous venous access devices in cancer patients.
    Repelaer van Driel OJ; Kuin CM; van de Velde CJ
    Neth J Surg; 1988 Jun; 40(4):97-9. PubMed ID: 3217033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of outcomes and survivals for two central venous access port systems.
    Hou SM; Wang PC; Sung YC; Lee HH; Liu HT; Chen YH
    J Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 91(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15999349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: A randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life.
    Bow EJ; Kilpatrick MG; Clinch JJ
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 Apr; 17(4):1267. PubMed ID: 10561188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy.
    Ng F; Mastoroudes H; Paul E; Davies N; Tibballs J; Hochhauser D; Mayer A; Begent R; Meyer T
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2007 Sep; 19(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 17517500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outpatient implantation of a central venous access system in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Shen-Gunther J; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Gold MA; Johnson GA
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Nov; 48(11):875-81. PubMed ID: 14686020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prolonged venous access in cancer patients.
    Guenier C; Ferreira J; Pector JC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1989 Dec; 15(6):553-5. PubMed ID: 2599125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central venous catheter with subcutaneous injection port (Port-A-Cath): 8 years clinical follow up with children.
    Wesenberg F; Flaatten H; Janssen CW
    Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 1993; 10(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 8217538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advances in venous access devices and nursing management strategies.
    Wickham RS
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1990 Jun; 25(2):345-64. PubMed ID: 2110664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Catheter outcomes in home infusion.
    Leone M; Dillon LR
    J Infus Nurs; 2008; 31(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 18344768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
    Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Higher complication risk of totally implantable venous access port systems in patients with advanced cancer - a single institution retrospective analysis.
    Chang YF; Lo AC; Tsai CH; Lee PY; Sun S; Chang TH; Chen CC; Chang YS; Chen JR
    Palliat Med; 2013 Feb; 27(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 22126844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safe use of power injectors with central and peripheral venous access devices for pediatric CT.
    Kaste SC; Young CW
    Pediatr Radiol; 1996; 26(8):499-501. PubMed ID: 8753658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new peripherally implanted subcutaneous permanent central venous access device for patients requiring chemotherapy.
    Salem RR; Ward BA; Ravikumar TS
    J Clin Oncol; 1993 Nov; 11(11):2181-5. PubMed ID: 8229132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.