BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19255205)

  • 1. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.
    Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.
    Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
    Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.
    Villanueva-Martínez M; De la Torre-Escudero B; Rojo-Manaute JM; Ríos-Luna A; Chana-Rodriguez F
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 23414934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tantalum Cones Provide Durable Mid-term Fixation in Revision TKA.
    De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Assini JB; Gasparini G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 473(10):3176-82. PubMed ID: 25968895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.
    Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM
    Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?
    Lachiewicz PF; Bolognesi MP; Henderson RA; Soileau ES; Vail TP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jan; 470(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 21465329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up.
    Huang R; Barrazueta G; Ong A; Orozco F; Jafari M; Coyle C; Austin M
    Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e804-9. PubMed ID: 25350623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Schmitz HC; Klauser W; Citak M; Al-Khateeb H; Gehrke T; Kendoff D
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1556-60. PubMed ID: 23664075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
    Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
    Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement.
    Rao BM; Kamal TT; Vafaye J; Moss M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23908422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Long WJ; Scuderi GR
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1086-92. PubMed ID: 18823749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
    You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
    Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of large bone defects with trabecular metal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Derome P; Sternheim A; Backstein D; Malo M
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 23702265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tantalum cones and bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Boureau F; Putman S; Arnould A; Dereudre G; Migaud H; Pasquier G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 25755068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.