273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19255317)
1. Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems.
Zivanovic O; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Jacks LM; Zhou Q; Abu-Rustum NR; Soslow RA; Juretzka MM; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Brennan MF; Hensley ML
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(12):2066-72. PubMed ID: 19255317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of current staging systems and a novel staging system for uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Giuntoli RL; Lessard-Anderson CR; Gerardi MA; Kushnir CL; Cliby WA; Metzinger DS; Gostout BS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):869-76. PubMed ID: 23669444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive value of FIGO and AJCC staging systems in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Raut CP; Nucci MR; Wang Q; Manola J; Bertagnolli MM; Demetri GD; Morgan JA; Muto MG; Fletcher CD; George S
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Nov; 45(16):2818-24. PubMed ID: 19647426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A nomogram to predict postresection 5-year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Zivanovic O; Jacks LM; Iasonos A; Leitao MM; Soslow RA; Veras E; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Brennan MF; Hensley ML
Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(3):660-9. PubMed ID: 21751199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uterine leiomyosarcoma in asian patients: validation of the revised Federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging system and identification of prognostic classifiers.
Tan PS; Koh E; Pang C; Ong WS; Ngo L; Soh LT; Quek R; Chay WY; Ho TH; Tay SK; Chew SH; Lim-Tan SK; Khoo-Tan H; Lim SL; Busmanis I; Goh LK; Chia YN; Chia WK; Lim T
Oncologist; 2012; 17(10):1286-93. PubMed ID: 22829569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Old versus new FIGO staging systems in predicting overall survival in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a study of 86 cases.
Lim D; Wang WL; Lee CH; Dodge T; Gilks B; Oliva E
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 128(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 23153591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of tumor size as staging variable in the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I leiomyosarcoma: a population-based study.
Garg G; Shah JP; Liu JR; Bryant CS; Kumar S; Munkarah A; Morris RT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1201-6. PubMed ID: 20940535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas: can the revised 2008 staging system predict survival outcome better?
Yim GW; Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 May; 55(3):563-9. PubMed ID: 24719120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer more prognostic than the 2009 FIGO staging system for women previously staged as IB disease?
Ayhan A; Aslan K; Bulut AN; Akilli H; Öz M; Haberal A; Meydanli MM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():209-214. PubMed ID: 31325847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimates of stage-specific survival are altered by changes in the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for melanoma.
Ben-Porat L; Panageas KS; Hanlon C; Patel A; Halpern A; Houghton AN; Coit D
Cancer; 2006 Jan; 106(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 16331596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of patients with uterine sarcoma: analysis of 127 patients at a single institution, 1989-2007.
Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 134(12):1277-87. PubMed ID: 18506484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic factors in early-stage leiomyosarcoma of the uterus.
Pelmus M; Penault-Llorca F; Guillou L; Collin F; Bertrand G; Trassard M; Leroux A; Floquet A; Stoeckle E; Thomas L; MacGrogan G
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 19407564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to deal with prognostic factors and radiotherapy results in uterine neoplasms with a sarcomatous component?
Rovirosa A; Ascaso C; Ordi J; Arenas M; Valduvieco I; Lejarcegui JA; Pahisa J; Torne A; Biete A
Clin Transl Oncol; 2009 Oct; 11(10):681-7. PubMed ID: 19828411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of prognostic variables, development of predictive models, and stratification of risk groups in surgically treated FIGO early-stage (IA-IIA) carcinoma cervix.
Singh P; Tripcony L; Nicklin J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21997176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine Sarcoma: Clinical Presentation, Treatment and Survival Outcomes in Thailand.
Potikul C; Tangjitgamol S; Khunnarong J; Srijaipracharoen S; Thavaramara T; Pataradool K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):1759-67. PubMed ID: 27221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
