BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19255317)

  • 21. Comparing survival outcomes for cervical cancer based on the 2014 and 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging systems.
    Shin W; Ham TY; Park YR; Lim MC; Won YJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6988. PubMed ID: 33772044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.
    Saleh M; Virarkar M; Javadi S; Elsherif SB; de Castro Faria S; Bhosale P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 May; 214(5):1182-1195. PubMed ID: 32182097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinicopathologic Factors of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Stages IB to IIB.
    Mabuchi Y; Yahata T; Kobayashi A; Tanizaki Y; Shiro M; Ota N; Yagi S; Minami S; Ino K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Nov; 25(9):1677-82. PubMed ID: 26495760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Clinical significance of the revised international federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging system 2009].
    Shen K; Peng P; Wu M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 45(10):721-4. PubMed ID: 21176549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prognostic factors and outcomes in 28 cases of uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Loizzi V; Cormio G; Nestola D; Falagario M; Surgo A; Camporeale A; Putignano G; Selvaggi L
    Oncology; 2011; 81(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21968290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risk factors for survival of head and neck soft tissue sarcomas: A comparison between 7th and 8th edition AJCC staging systems.
    Ku JY; Roh JL; Cho KJ; Song JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Oral Oncol; 2020 Jul; 106():104705. PubMed ID: 32298997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
    Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
    Liu X; Wang W; Hu K; Zhang F; Hou X; Yan J; Meng Q; Zhou Z; Miao Z; Guan H; Ma J; Shen J; Zhen H; Wang W
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):362. PubMed ID: 31941966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prognostic factors and survival outcomes of women with uterine leiomyosarcoma: A Turkish Uterine Sarcoma Group Study-003.
    Ayhan A; Gungorduk K; Khatib G; Fırat Cüylan Z; Boran N; Gökçü M; Çelik H; Özgül N; Akbayir Ö; Şimşek T; Bakay A; Faruk Köse M; Tunç M; Küçükgöz Güleç Ü; Koç S; Kuşçu E; Vardar MA; Akilli H; Taskiran C; Mutlu Meydanlı M
    Curr Probl Cancer; 2021 Oct; 45(5):100712. PubMed ID: 33685725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The local treatment modalities in FIGO stage I-II small-cell carcinoma of the cervix are determined by disease stage and lymph node status.
    Zhou J; Yang HY; Wu SG; He ZY; Lin HX; Sun JY; Li Q; Guo ZW
    Cancer Med; 2016 Jun; 5(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26990881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differentiation of survival outcomes by anatomic involvement and histology with the revised 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer.
    Gravbrot N; Weil CR; DeCesaris CM; Gaffney DK; Suneja G; Burt LM
    Eur J Cancer; 2024 Apr; 201():113913. PubMed ID: 38377777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness of adjuvant treatment for morcellated, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma: A Korean multicenter study.
    Kim SI; Choi CH; Kim K; Hong DH; Park JY; Kwon BS; Lee KH; Hong DG; Shin SJ; Park SI; Kim YH; Lee SH; Lee S; Hong JH; Lee JY; Kim YB; No JH; Suh DH
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Feb; 46(2):337-346. PubMed ID: 31814199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors.
    Yan DD; Tang Q; Chen JH; Tu YQ; Lv XJ
    Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():5473-5480. PubMed ID: 31354353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009.
    Zhang Y; Ding J; Hua K
    J Int Med Res; 2022 Jan; 50(1):3000605211067397. PubMed ID: 34986672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The tumor-stroma ratio is an independent predictor of survival in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix following primary radical surgery.
    Zong L; Zhang Q; Kong Y; Yang F; Zhou Y; Yu S; Wu M; Chen J; Zhang Y; Xiang Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):676-681. PubMed ID: 31882242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The new (Version 9) American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging for cervical cancer.
    Olawaiye AB; Baker TP; Washington MK; Mutch DG
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2021 Jul; 71(4):287-298. PubMed ID: 33784415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of AJCC 1988 and 1997 classifications for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. American Joint Committee on Cancer.
    Ozyar E; Yildiz F; Akyol FH; Atahan IL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1079-87. PubMed ID: 10421542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system.
    Matsuo K; Machida H; Mandelbaum RS; Konishi I; Mikami M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 30389105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina.
    Kosary CL
    Semin Surg Oncol; 1994; 10(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 8115784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
    Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.