243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19256741)
1. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Efficacy in Abnormal Cervical Cell Detection between Liquid-based Cytology and Conventional Cytology.
Tanabodee J; Thepsuwan K; Karalak A; Laoaree O; Krachang A; Manmatt K; Anontwatanawong N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(16):7381-4. PubMed ID: 26514540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.
Akamatsu S; Kodama S; Himeji Y; Ikuta N; Shimagaki N
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22846595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for detection of uterine cervical lesions: a prospective observational study.
Nishio H; Iwata T; Nomura H; Morisada T; Takeshima N; Takano H; Sasaki H; Nakatani E; Teramukai S; Aoki D
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 48(6):522-528. PubMed ID: 29668969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparative diagnostic accuracy of conventional and liquid-based cytology in a colposcopic setting.
Hussein T; Desai M; Tomlinson A; Kitchener HC
BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1542-6. PubMed ID: 16225576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits of Cervical Cancer Screening by Liquid-Based Cytology as Part of Routine Antenatal Assessment.
Parkpinyo N; Inthasorn P; Laiwejpithaya S; Punnarat T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4457-4461. PubMed ID: 27797261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinicopathologic importance of women with squamous cell carcinoma cytology on Siriraj liquid-based cervical cytology.
Ruengkhachorn I; Laiwejpithaya S; Leelaphatanadit C; Chaopotong P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(9):4567-70. PubMed ID: 23167381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Performance of the Newly Developed WellPrep® Liquid-Based Cytology System and Its Comparison with SurePathTM in Cervical Squamous Lesions.
Choi JE; Jin MS; Nikas IP; Ryu HS
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 36412571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised comparison of SurePath liquid-based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting.
Sykes PH; Harker DY; Miller A; Whitehead M; Neal H; Wells JE; Peddie D
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1375-81. PubMed ID: 18823488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ThinPrep and SurePath liquid-based cytology and subsequent human papillomavirus DNA testing in China.
Zhao FH; Hu SY; Bian JJ; Liu B; Peck RB; Bao YP; Pan QJ; Frappart L; Sellors J; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 21774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized trial comparing conventional cytology to liquid-based cytology and computer assistance.
Klug SJ; Neis KJ; Harlfinger W; Malter A; König J; Spieth S; Brinkmann-Smetanay F; Kommoss F; Weyer V; Ikenberg H
Int J Cancer; 2013 Jun; 132(12):2849-57. PubMed ID: 23175270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears.
Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Nicolau SM; Stávale JN; Focchi J; Castelo A; Dôres GB; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Lorincz A; Rodrigues de Lima G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 15048954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar.
Pankaj S; Nazneen S; Kumari S; Kumari A; Kumari A; Kumari J; Choudhary V; Kumar S
Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 30147099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid-based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials.
Castle PE; Bulten J; Confortini M; Klinkhamer P; Pellegrini A; Siebers AG; Ronco G; Arbyn M
BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1067-73. PubMed ID: 20604775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of agreement between conventional and liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer early detection based on analysis of 2,091 smears: experience at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.
Girianelli VR; Santos Thuler LC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):545-9. PubMed ID: 17703446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of transformation zone cells in liquid-based cytology and its comparison with conventional smears.
Campaner AB; Fernandes GL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Aug; 48(8):752-758. PubMed ID: 32394634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk assessment and clinical impact of liquid-based cytology, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and mRNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening (the FASE study).
Monsonego J; Hudgens MG; Zerat L; Zerat JC; Syrjänen K; Smith JS
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 22233689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
