These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1925786)

  • 1. [In vitro comparison of properties of aortic allotransplants and the Björk-Shiley valve].
    Vrsanský D; Simkovic I
    Rozhl Chir; 1991 Feb; 70(1-2):60-3. PubMed ID: 1925786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve.
    Butterfield M; Fisher J; Davies GA; Spyt TJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Oct; 52(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 1929635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
    Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison between the hydrodynamic characteristics of the Hancock 250 (modified orifice) xenografts and the Björk-Shiley aortic valve prostheses.
    Wright JT
    Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1977; 23():89-94. PubMed ID: 910416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The effect of glutaraldehyde preparations on the properties of biological heart valve prostheses].
    Vrsanský D
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 1991 Jul; 92(7):352-4. PubMed ID: 1913202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Functional transvalvular regurgitation in patients with Björk-Shiley aortic valves: a pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study].
    Yoshida K; Yoshikawa J; Kato H; Yanagihara K; Okumachi F; Koizumi K; Shiratori K; Asaka T; Suzuki K; Inanami H
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1137-44. PubMed ID: 3841896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro closing behaviour of Björk-Shiley, St Jude and Hancock heart valve prostheses in relation to the in vivo recorded aortic valve closure.
    van Steenhoven AA; van Duppen TJ; Cauwenberg JW; van Renterghem RJ
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 7161286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Microcomputer-assisted system for photographing the movements of biological valve prostheses].
    Vrsanský D; Kiss A; Simkovic I
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 1989 May; 90(5):336-8. PubMed ID: 2758334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
    Mudra H; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An examination of two retrieved long-term human implant Björk-Shiley valves.
    More RB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(3-4):195-200. PubMed ID: 7877565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves].
    Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
    Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Replacement of cardiac valves with Björk-Shiley and Cooley-Cutter prostheses: a comparative study (author's transl)].
    Chiariello L; Wukasch C; Cooley A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 856658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
    Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
    Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
    Nashef SA; Sethia B; Turner MA; Davidson KG; Lewis S; Bain WH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Non-invasive determination of pressure gradients of heart valve prostheses using Doppler ultrasound].
    Hoffmann A; Amann FW; Grädel E; Burckhardt D
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1600-3. PubMed ID: 7156956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replacement of a Björk-Shiley Delrin aortic valve still functioning after 25 years.
    Badak MI; Ozkisacik EA; Boga M; Gurcun U; Discigil B
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2004; 31(3):303-5; discussion 305. PubMed ID: 15562853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.