These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1925786)
1. [In vitro comparison of properties of aortic allotransplants and the Björk-Shiley valve]. Vrsanský D; Simkovic I Rozhl Chir; 1991 Feb; 70(1-2):60-3. PubMed ID: 1925786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve. Butterfield M; Fisher J; Davies GA; Spyt TJ Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Oct; 52(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 1929635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison between the hydrodynamic characteristics of the Hancock 250 (modified orifice) xenografts and the Björk-Shiley aortic valve prostheses. Wright JT Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1977; 23():89-94. PubMed ID: 910416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The effect of glutaraldehyde preparations on the properties of biological heart valve prostheses]. Vrsanský D Bratisl Lek Listy; 1991 Jul; 92(7):352-4. PubMed ID: 1913202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Functional transvalvular regurgitation in patients with Björk-Shiley aortic valves: a pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study]. Yoshida K; Yoshikawa J; Kato H; Yanagihara K; Okumachi F; Koizumi K; Shiratori K; Asaka T; Suzuki K; Inanami H J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec; 15(4):1137-44. PubMed ID: 3841896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro closing behaviour of Björk-Shiley, St Jude and Hancock heart valve prostheses in relation to the in vivo recorded aortic valve closure. van Steenhoven AA; van Duppen TJ; Cauwenberg JW; van Renterghem RJ J Biomech; 1982; 15(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 7161286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Microcomputer-assisted system for photographing the movements of biological valve prostheses]. Vrsanský D; Kiss A; Simkovic I Bratisl Lek Listy; 1989 May; 90(5):336-8. PubMed ID: 2758334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An examination of two retrieved long-term human implant Björk-Shiley valves. More RB Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(3-4):195-200. PubMed ID: 7877565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves]. Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Replacement of cardiac valves with Björk-Shiley and Cooley-Cutter prostheses: a comparative study (author's transl)]. Chiariello L; Wukasch C; Cooley A G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 856658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position]. Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]