253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19258612)
1. Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system.
Dalury DF; Mason JB; Murphy JA; Adams MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 19258612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Bi-Surface total knee arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up study.
Nakamura S; Kobayashi M; Ito H; Nakamura K; Ueo T; Nakamura T
Knee; 2010 Aug; 17(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 20303765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements with a five-year follow-up.
Jolles BM; Grzesiak A; Eudier A; Dejnabadi H; Voracek C; Pichonnaz C; Aminian K; Martin E
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 May; 94(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 22529085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a high-flexion design affect early outcome of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty? Clinical comparison at 2 years.
Geller JA; Yoon RS; McKean J; Macaulay W
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1468-74. PubMed ID: 22075162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of gender on outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Lustig S; Barba N; Magnussen RA; Servien E; Demey G; Neyret P
Knee; 2012 Jun; 19(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 21440443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study.
Amin AK; Patton JT; Cook RE; Gaston M; Brenkel IJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Oct; 451():101-6. PubMed ID: 16760806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with a minimum follow-up of ten years.
Hooper G; Rothwell A; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19092005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do we need a gender-specific total knee replacement? A randomised controlled trial comparing a high-flex and a gender-specific posterior design.
Thomsen MG; Husted H; Bencke J; Curtis D; Holm G; Troelsen A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 22628593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty].
Shi MG; Lü HS; Guan ZP
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(16):1101-5. PubMed ID: 17081464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of American and Japanese cohorts.
Iorio R; Kobayashi S; Healy WL; Cruz AI; Ayers ME
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2007; 16(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 18053397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty.
Ritter MA; Wing JT; Berend ME; Davis KE; Meding JB
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 18358368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Matched pair analysis: Innex FIXUC vs. NexGen LPS].
Hauk C; Heyse TJ; Witteborn MC; Schofer MD; Fuchs-Winkelmann S; Schmitt J
Z Orthop Unfall; 2009; 147(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 19358072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
Vavrík P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survivorship of the St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental knee replacement beyond ten years.
Steele RG; Hutabarat S; Evans RL; Ackroyd CE; Newman JH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1164-8. PubMed ID: 16943465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components.
Nutton RW; van der Linden ML; Rowe PJ; Gaston P; Wade FA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Jan; 90(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18160497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Short-term effect of rotating hinge knee prosthesis].
Lei G; Gao S; Li K
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Mar; 21(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17419198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases.
Pandit H; Jenkins C; Gill HS; Barker K; Dodd CA; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21282759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Newman J; Pydisetty RV; Ackroyd C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19092004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five- to eight-year results of a prospective study in 118 arthroplasties using posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee implants.
Maniar RN; Gupta H; Singh A; Johorey AC; Singhi T
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 20541357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
