166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19258938)
21. Stage Ia1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma: conservative management after laser conization with positive margins.
Itsukaichi M; Kurata H; Matsushita M; Watanabe M; Sekine M; Aoki Y; Tanaka K
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 12893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III of uterine cervix. Morphologic differences other than stromal invasion.
Leung KM; Chan WY; Hui PK
Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Apr; 101(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 7512787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fascin expression in cervical normal squamous epithelium, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and superficially invasive (stage IA1) squamous carcinoma of the cervix.
Koay MH; Crook M; Stewart CJ
Pathology; 2014 Aug; 46(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 24977742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III and squamous cell cervical carcinoma, and its correlation with clinicopathologic variables.
Dursun P; Yuce K; Usubutun A; Ayhan A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 17291249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
Favalli G; Lomini M; Schreiber C; Ciravolo G; Junasevic J; Pecorelli S; Bianchi UA
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 10375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
Myllynen L; Karjalainen O
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors predicting human papillomavirus clearance in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions treated by conization.
Costa S; De Simone P; Venturoli S; Cricca M; Zerbini ML; Musiani M; Terzano P; Santini D; Cristiani P; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):358-65. PubMed ID: 12893200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): histological results and recurrence after a loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Nogara PR; Manfroni LA; Consolaro ME
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Oct; 284(4):965-71. PubMed ID: 21052702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk of residual invasive disease in women with microinvasive squamous cancer in a conization specimen.
Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Agahjanian A; Qian D; Morrow CP
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 9351760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
