431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19260423)
1. Zygoma implants for midfacial prosthetic rehabilitation using telescopes: 9-year follow-up.
Landes CA; Paffrath C; Koehler C; Thai VD; Stübinger S; Sader R; Lauer HC; Piwowarczyk A
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 19260423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.
Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Garcia R; Arevalo X; Muela R; Fortes V
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 16919019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of the zygoma implant: 3-year follow-up at 16 clinics.
Kahnberg KE; Henry PJ; Hirsch JM; Ohrnell LO; Andreasson L; Brånemark PI; Chiapasco M; Gynther G; Finne K; Higuchi KW; Isaksson S; Malevez C; Neukam FW; Sevetz E; Urgell JP; Widmark G; Bolind P
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2033-8. PubMed ID: 17884535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study.
Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Lopes I
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):354-66. PubMed ID: 18992569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: zygomatic versus conventional implants.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Martí E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):769-73. PubMed ID: 17974111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Zygoma implant-supported midfacial prosthetic rehabilitation: a 4-year follow-up study including assessment of quality of life.
Landes CA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Jun; 16(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 15877752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study of 25 zygomatic dental implants with 11 to 49 months' follow-up after loading.
Ahlgren F; Størksen K; Tornes K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(3):421-5. PubMed ID: 16796285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report.
Kreissl ME; Heydecke G; Metzger MC; Schoen R
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 17394908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla: a review of 101 zygomatic implants.
Pi Urgell J; Revilla Gutiérrez V; Gay Escoda CG
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Jun; 13(6):E363-70. PubMed ID: 18521062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival rate of zygomatic implants in atrophic or partially resected maxillae prior to functional loading: a retrospective clinical report.
Zwahlen RA; Grätz KW; Oechslin CK; Studer SP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 16796284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate function in the atrophic maxilla using zygoma implants: a preliminary study.
Davo R; Malevez C; Rojas J
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S44-51. PubMed ID: 17618933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a maxillary defect.
Shirota T; Shimodaira O; Matsui Y; Hatori M; Shintani S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 20728311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical application of zygomatic implants for rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report.
Nakai H; Okazaki Y; Ueda M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):566-70. PubMed ID: 12939010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective study of 68 implants placed in the pterygomaxillary region using drills and osteotomes.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Peñarrocha M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):720-6. PubMed ID: 19885414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survival rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 19033030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial speech problems in patients treated with multiple zygomatic implants.
Bothur S; Garsten M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 20369099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.
Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 19397637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
