BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1006 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261015)

  • 1. Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006.
    Hammonds LM; Hall VC; Yiannias JA
    Int J Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 19261015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which children should we patch test?
    Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema.
    Moustafa M; Holden CR; Athavale P; Cork MJ; Messenger AG; Gawkrodger DJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Oct; 65(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 21504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre.
    Clayton TH; Wilkinson SM; Rawcliffe C; Pollock B; Clark SM
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 154(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 16403103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.
    de Waard-van der Spek FB; Oranje AP
    Dermatology; 2009; 218(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18946202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
    Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Allergic skin disease: investigation of both immediate- and delayed-type hypersensitivity is essential.
    Usmani N; Wilkinson SM
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1541-6. PubMed ID: 17883733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
    Soni BP; Sherertz EF
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
    Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occupational chromate allergy in Singapore: a study of 87 patients and a review from 1983 to 1995.
    Wong SS; Chan MT; Gan SL; Ng SK; Goh CL
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9471980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
    Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
    Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
    Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
    Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004.
    Warshaw EM; Furda LM; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Belsito DV; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 144(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 18559763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact allergy in chronic eczematous lip dermatitis.
    Schena D; Fantuzzi F; Girolomoni G
    Eur J Dermatol; 2008; 18(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 18955202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact sensitization in 1094 children undergoing patch testing over a 7-year period.
    Seidenari S; Giusti F; Pepe P; Mantovani L
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2005; 22(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15660887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: the Ottawa hospital patch-testing clinic experience, 1996 to 2006.
    Hogeling M; Pratt M
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 18413109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children - a review of current data.
    Simonsen AB; Deleuran M; Johansen JD; Sommerlund M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Nov; 65(5):254-65. PubMed ID: 21851361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 51.