These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261293)

  • 1. Intra- and interreader variability in QT interval measurement by tangent and threshold methods in a central electrocardiogram laboratory.
    Panicker GK; Karnad DR; Natekar M; Kothari S; Narula D; Lokhandwala Y
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 19261293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of QTinno, a fully automated electrocardiographic analysis program, to semiautomated electrocardiographic analysis methods in a drug safety study in healthy subjects.
    Sarapa N; Gussak I; Vajdic B; George S; Hadzievski L; Francom SF; Kowey P
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 19362316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semiautomated QT interval measurement in electrocardiograms from a thorough QT study: comparison of the grouped and ungrouped superimposed median beat methods.
    Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Ramasamy A; Panicker GK; Salvi V; Bhoir H; Kothari S
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 22364647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences between QT and RR intervals in digital and digitized paper electrocardiograms: contribution of the printer, scanner, and digitization process.
    Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Deshmukh S; Kothari S; Narula D
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 18482732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement.
    Badilini F; Sarapa N
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S152-6. PubMed ID: 16920141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An algorithm for QT interval monitoring in neonatal intensive care units.
    Helfenbein ED; Ackerman MJ; Rautaharju PM; Zhou SH; Gregg RE; Lindauer JM; Miller D; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Babaeizadeh S; Feild DQ; Michaud FP
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6 Suppl):S103-10. PubMed ID: 17993306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 5 methods of QT interval measurements on electrocardiograms from a thorough QT/QTc study: effect on assay sensitivity and categorical outliers.
    Salvi V; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Natekar M; Hingorani P; Kerkar V; Ramasamy A; de Vries M; Zumbrunnen T; Kothari S; Narula D
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21238976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic analysis of cardiac repolarization morphology using Gaussian mesa function modeling.
    Badilini F; Vaglio M; Dubois R; Roussel P; Sarapa N; Denjoy I; Extramiana F; Maison-Blanche P
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):588-94. PubMed ID: 18954609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delineation of T-wave in ECG by wavelet transform using multiscale differential operator.
    Chen PC; Lee S; Kuo CD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1429-33. PubMed ID: 16830948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An algorithm for continuous real-time QT interval monitoring.
    Helfenbein ED; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Field DQ; Gregg RE; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Michaud FP
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S123-7. PubMed ID: 16920145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of QT-measurement accuracy using the 12-lead electrocardiogram derived from EASI leads.
    Martínez JP; Laguna P; Olmos S; Pahlm O; Pettersson J; Sörnmo L
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 17027840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision of QT interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment.
    Hnatkova K; Gang Y; Batchvarov VN; Malik M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1277-84. PubMed ID: 17100684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An algorithm for robust and efficient location of T-wave ends in electrocardiograms.
    Zhang Q; Manriquez AI; Médigue C; Papelier Y; Sorine M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2544-52. PubMed ID: 17153212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of noise on T-wave alternans measurement in ambulatory ECGs using modified moving average versus spectral method.
    Selvaraj RJ; Chauhan VS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 May; 32(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 19422585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic comparisons of electrocardiographic morphology increase the precision of QT interval measurement.
    Hnatkova K; Smetana P; Toman O; Bauer A; Schmidt G; Malik M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 19140922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time multichannel system for beat-to-beat QT interval variability.
    Starc V; Schlegel TT
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4):358-67. PubMed ID: 16919668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of ANOVA to estimate inter- and intra-reader variability for a group of readers in thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Natekar M; Mahajan V; Satra A; O'Kelly M; Karnad DR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Mar; 83(3):489-91. PubMed ID: 18183035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the upper limit of the reference value of the QT interval in rest electrocardiograms in healthy young Japanese men using the bootstrap method.
    Goto H; Mamorita N; Ikeda N; Miyahara H
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):703.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18954612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. QT variability and HRV interactions in ECG: quantification and reliability.
    Almeida R; Gouveia S; Rocha AP; Pueyo E; Martínez JP; Laguna P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1317-29. PubMed ID: 16830936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pattern recognition analysis of digital ECGs: decreased QT measurement error and improved precision compared to semi-automated methods.
    Meyer O; Ferber G; Greig G; Holzgrefe HH
    J Electrocardiol; 2013; 46(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 23266069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.