These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm. Shah AP; Rubin SA J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Extraction and analysis of T waves in electrocardiograms during atrial flutter. Jacquemet V; Dubé B; Nadeau R; LeBlanc AR; Sturmer M; Becker G; Kus T; Vinet A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Apr; 58(4):1104-12. PubMed ID: 21156384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dataset of manually measured QT intervals in the electrocardiogram. Christov I; Dotsinsky I; Simova I; Prokopova R; Trendafilova E; Naydenov S Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():31. PubMed ID: 16707025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of reproducibility--automated and digital caliper ECG measurement in the Framingham Heart Study. Burke GM; Wang N; Blease S; Levy D; Magnani JW J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 24792985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reader- and instrument-dependent variability in the electrocardiographic assessment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Jain R; Tandri H; Daly A; Tichnell C; James C; Abraham T; Judge DP; Calkins H; Dalal D J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 May; 22(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 21114702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multidifferentiator-based approach to the reliable determination of T-wave offset in electrocardiograms. Zhou X; Wei D J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 21276591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. T(p-e)/QT ratio as an index of arrhythmogenesis. Gupta P; Patel C; Patel H; Narayanaswamy S; Malhotra B; Green JT; Yan GX J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 18790499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation. Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reader variability in QT measurement due to measurement error and variability in leads selection: a simulation study comparing 2-way vs. 3-way interaction ANOVA model. Natekar M; Karnad DR; Salvi V; Ramasamy A; Kerkar V; Panicker GK; Kothari S J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 24209499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Study of repolarization heterogeneity and electrocardiographic morphology with a modeling approach. Xue J; Gao W; Chen Y; Han X J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 18804785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigating the effect of sotalol on the repolarization intervals in healthy young individuals. Couderc JP; Zhou M; Sarapa N; Zareba W J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 18801493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of noise on computerized electrocardiogram measurements. Farrell RM; Rowlandson GI J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S165-73. PubMed ID: 16963064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatiotemporal electrocardiographic characterization of ventricular depolarization and repolarization abnormalities in long QT syndrome. Restier-Miron L; Fayn J; Millat G; Denjoy I; Rodriguez-Lafrasse C; Rubel P; Chevalier P J Electrocardiol; 2007 Oct; 40(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 17316676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimum way to evaluate the quality of QT interval measurement in pharmaceutical studies. Malik M J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 19665724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Methodological principles of T wave alternans analysis: a unified framework. Martínez JP; Olmos S IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):599-613. PubMed ID: 15825862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measurement of high resolution ECG QT interval during controlled euglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Ireland RH; Robinson RT; Heller SR; Marques JL; Harris ND Physiol Meas; 2000 May; 21(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 10847196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Man versus machine: is there an optimal method for QT measurements in thorough QT studies? Darpo B; Agin M; Kazierad DJ; Layton G; Muirhead G; Gray P; Jorkasky DK J Clin Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 46(6):598-612. PubMed ID: 16707406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]